Share This Page

The wisdom of (George) Washington

| Sunday, March 31, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

We've dropped a long way in 224 years, from Washington then to Washington now, from George Washington to Washington, D.C.

Born into a Virginia farming family, the commander of the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War and the first U.S. president is consistently ranked as one of the greatest American presidents.

Washington, D.C., in contrast, is consistently ranked as one of the greatest manifestations of incompetence, corruption and waste.

A CBS News poll released last week reported that 80 percent of Americans are dissatisfied with Washington politicians — including 30 percent who are outright angry, the highest level of anger recorded since polling on that question began in February 2010.

Additionally, 61 percent of Americans said the country is headed in the wrong direction, President Obama's approval rating is rapidly slipping, and the approval rating of the job Congress is doing has dropped to 11 percent.

Reflecting the rising level of anger, an opinion survey released in January by Public Policy Polling reported that Americans have a higher opinion of cockroaches and colonoscopies than Congress.

On a more positive note, Congress did have a higher approval rating in the Public Policy Polling survey, by a small margin, than Lindsay Lohan, Fidel Castro and the Kardashians.

The following synopsis of George Washington's views is probably enough to indicate why he is held in higher esteem than the nation's current crop of politicians.

On a governing philosophy: “The Constitution is the guide which I never will abandon.”

On war and foreign entanglements: “I have always given it as my decided opinion that no nation had a right to intermeddle in the internal concerns of another.” (The Pentagon reports that the U.S. has 662 overseas bases in 38 countries and American military personnel on the ground in 148 countries.)

On foreign policy: “My aim has been to keep the United States free from political connections with every other country.” (As President Obama completed his meetings with Palestinian leaders in the West Bank, the U.S. State Department announced that it had unblocked $500 million in aid to the Palestinian Authority.)

On censorship and political correctness: “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

On debt: “To contract new debts is not the way to pay old debts.”

On inadequate resistance to statism: “The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their government.”

On preparedness: “There is nothing so likely to produce peace as to be well prepared to meet an enemy.”

In contrast, here is Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's reply in Kuwait, December 2004, after being told by an American soldier heading for Iraq that they had to scrounge through local garbage dumps for pieces of scrap metal to attach to their vehicles as protection against roadside bombs: “You go to war with the army you have.”

The Washington Post reported in 2007 that 64 percent of American deaths in Iraq were due to improvised explosive devices, also known as roadside bombs.

Ralph R. Reiland is an associate professor of economics at Robert Morris University and a local restaurateur. Email him at: rrreiland@aol.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.