Share This Page

Living large on the taxpayers' dime

| Sunday, April 7, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Behaving more like political royalty than “public servants,” Vice President Joe Biden and his entourage ran up a one-night tab of $459,388.65 in February in a London hotel, the five-star Hyatt Regency.

That's enough money to keep the White House tours open, at the federal government's reported cost of $74,000 a week, for six weeks.

Jacking up the extravagance, also in February, Biden's one-night tab in France at the five-star Hotel InterContinental Paris Le Grande was $585,000.50. Just the hotel expense for that one night was enough to pay for the re-opening of the White House tours for another eight weeks.

Biden's hotel tab for just two nights, in short, is equal to the entire cost of keeping the White House tours open for all of June, July and August — or the entire cost of stopping thousands of school kids from bellyaching because the White House is shut down for tours this year during their summer vacation.

And there's more. On top of Biden's $585,000 hotel bill for a night in Paris, courtesy of American taxpayers (or Chinese lenders), CNN's Wolf Blitzer uncovered a receipt to a limousine company for the Biden entourage in Paris for $321,665.

I think we need an auditor. They shouldn't even need a room if they're spending that much riding around. And even if these trips were necessary in an age of video conferencing, one-star hotels should have been more than sufficient given the level of performance we're getting from the federal government.

We don't have the tab yet, but it will likely be another half million or more for Biden's recent stop in Rome, where he, along with his sister, Valarie Biden Owens, got to meet the new pope just two days before the Federal Aviation Administration announced it was shutting down air traffic control towers because of a shortage of federal money.

Adding more red ink, President Obama flew to Denver last Wednesday to say nothing new about gun control and today he's scheduled to fly to Connecticut to say nothing new about gun control — nothing he couldn't say in the Rose Garden.

What's added to the federal deficit for the operation of Air Force One on these political jaunts is $179,750 per flight hour, according to the Congressional Research Service, and that's not counting the cost of cargo and passenger aircraft that frequently accompany the president's plane, or the costs of security and support staff.

For Obama's flights back and forth to Hawaii, the round-trip cost of just operating Air Force One is $3,271,626.

Starting yesterday, the FAA began shutting down 149 air traffic control towers at smaller airports in 46 states.

In Pennsylvania, that means pilots arriving and departing Capital City Airport in Harrisburg, Lancaster Airport in Lititz and Arnold Palmer Regional Airport in Latrobe will be more or less left to coordinate landings and takeoffs over shared radio frequencies with no help from controllers on the ground.

For an added measure of safety, it would be smart for passengers on window seats to put down their newspapers and keep their eyes peeled for any off-track Learjets or stray drones.

It also would be a good idea to take along some rosary beads that were blessed at Lourdes if you're flying at 600 mph on days with zero visibility.

Ralph R. Reiland is an associate professor of economics at Robert Morris University and a local restaurateur. His email: rrreiland@aol.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.