Education's ongoing implosion
Globally, the bad news regarding America's ability to successfully operate in an increasingly competitive and interconnected world economy is that 15-year-olds in the U.S. slipped further down in their rankings on international achievement tests recently administered by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Every three years, the Program for International Student Assessment evaluates students from 65 countries and several locales that produce 80 percent of the world's economic output.
In math, American students in the latest testing slipped six places in the international ranking, from 25th place to 31st place since 2009. In science and reading performance, American students dropped four and 10 places, respectively, from 20th to 24th in science and from 11th place to 21st in reading.
Only 9 percent of the U.S. students scored in the top two levels of proficiency in math, compared with 40 percent in Singapore and 17 percent in Poland and Germany.
The good news for American taxpayers is that an analysis of the test results shows a strong correlation between test scores and student punctuality and attendance and a weak correlation between class size and test scores.
So rather than hiking property taxes in order to hire more teachers and cut class sizes, what we need to do first to beat Russia (they scored slightly above us) and Poland (they just pulled ahead of us) is bounce our drowsy children out of bed on time and get them on the road with an industrious and agreeable mindset, like the kids in Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea and Japan (they're at the top of the list in the achievement rankings).
We should also stop the “everyone gets a trophy” idea, which basically and illogically says that no one wins but everyone is a winner just for showing up.
What that egalitarian pipe dream and flawed logic has produced is an oversupply of cocky non-performers who don't even bother to show up. Or if they're a cut above the no-shows, they think it's totally OK to show up late to pick up their punctuality awards.
“For decades, the prevailing wisdom in education was that high self-esteem would lead to high achievement,” reports Michael Chandler, education columnist at The Washington Post. “The theory led to an avalanche of daily affirmations and award ceremonies — but few, if any, academic gains.”
The commonsense idea that high performance would produce high self-esteem has been replaced by the notion that high levels of self-esteem would produce high achievement. The result is that “American students' self-esteem outstripped their achievement, which fell compared to their international peers,” reports Chandler.
American students took first place in self-judged mathematical ability in a comparative study of eight countries, but took last place in actual math competency. Korean students, in contrast, ranked themselves last in self-judged mathematical skills and took first place in actual math performance.
It is, obviously and unfortunately, not hard to find that same disastrous combination of self-judged high ability and sheer incompetency at the highest levels of the federal government, both at home and abroad, whether it's the planning and operation of the war in Iraq or the development, mislabeling and rollout of the Affordable Care Act.
Ralph R. Reiland is an associate professor of economics at Robert Morris University and a local restaurateur (email@example.com).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Starkey: Chryst a miserable failure at Pitt
- Pitt players support Rudolph for job
- Pouliot scores in NHL debut as Penguins tame Panthers
- Ex-Penguins defenseman Niskanen still miffed by coaches’ firings
- Pitt football fights to overcome steppingstone status
- Jeannette company’s miniature steam engines coveted for decades
- Steelers’ Bell, Chiefs’ Charles elevating running back position in NFL
- Energy sector adjusts to global oil plummet
- Pair of NYC officers killed in ambush shooting
- Pitt survives Oakland’s upset bid with overtime victory
- Sony hack signals new, public front in cyber warfare