Share This Page

Allegiance to parties wanes

| Saturday, Jan. 18, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

ELLWOOD CITY

Scores of churches line this charming community of streets punctuated by stately homes and trees. They even stretch out along the state routes leading into and out of town.

This is an old industrial place with a shrinking population, and it reflects the old tradition of each denomination proudly labeling its house of worship — Methodist, Lutheran, Catholic, Baptist and so on — because early immigrants settled in neighborhoods near where they wanted to pray and churches wanted to advertise their brands to attract like-minded worshipers.

Twenty miles south — in Cranberry Township, a bustling suburban crossroads of two interstates — the churches are as abundant as in Ellwood City. But the township's newer churches tell a different story; built alongside housing that burst from former farmland, they do not use denominational labels on their logos and signs, or even in their Yellow Pages listings.

“Labels are losers in today's marketing environment,” explained Brad Todd, a Tennessee native and a Washington media expert for Republicans. “Successful communicators sell their personality, ideas and differentiated benefits, not their category.”

Americans are going through a similar metamorphosis in their political identities.

In the years following the December 2000 court battles of Bush v. Gore , something happened in America: Voters decided which jersey they wore, and they wore it all the time.

Yet, since the 2006 midterms, people trust political parties less, just as they trust every institution less, from retail giants to religious denominations — but they are becoming pretty loyal to ideologies.

A recent Gallup survey showed that 40 percent of Americans identify themselves as political independents, a sky-high figure, while both major political parties are suffering their lowest-ever identification numbers — Republicans at 25 percent, Democrats at 31 percent.

Neil Newhouse, a Republican pollster based in Washington, sees a similar trend in his data.

“With neither party perceived as ‘getting the job done,' party allegiance is slipping,” he said. He pointed to President Obama's unpopularity, the GOP's tarnished brand, eight years of recession (at least in voters' minds) and extreme frustration with government and politics-as-usual as the biggest factors behind that slippage.

“We are coming off two generations of adults who defined themselves by their affiliations and labels (and) into several successive generations that define themselves by their individual decisions and philosophies,” said Todd.

So must-have labels of the past, such as Calvin Klein jeans, Budweiser beer or the tug between whether you were a Coke or Pepsi drinker, have given way to off-brand jeans that are bought for style and fit, neighborhood microbreweries that are popping up all across the country and competing high-energy juices that have replaced the cola wars.

In short, because people avoid labels at all cost in their shopping carts, it only makes sense that they would avoid partisan labels.

While the Gallup data seem to suggest that fewer Democrats than Republicans now call themselves independents, a bit of nuance is at work here: Several pollsters note that their data show those who were Republicans and now call themselves independents are nearly all self-identified conservatives — but are not all tea partyers.

Both parties are suffering great internal fractures. The Republicans' family feud is much more open and bloody than that of Democrats, because Republicans are the party that is not in power. But this midterm election cycle will publicly scrape open the Democrats' wounds, as they move away from Barack Obama and struggle with the progressive faction of their party.

And there are signs that this election cycle may become a GOP resurrection. It takes time for a party to get its act together after losing, and Republicans finally are getting themselves together after their 2008 defeat. (In many ways, the “tea party” victory of 2010 was something of an illusion about the GOP's strength because many of those voters were not party regulars, which gave Republicans a false sense of hope about their chances in 2012.)

One thing is for certain, however: The unifying characteristic among all denominations of voters is their universal hatred for Washington and their increasing distaste for politics in general.

How each party deals with that will be the underlying story in American politics this year.

Salena Zito covers politics for Trib Total Media (412-320 -7879 or szito@tribweb.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.