Not so smart: Our new phone addiction
Get this: People are becoming addicted to their smartphones.
According to a report from Flurry Analytics, says The Washington Post's Style Blog, the average mobile consumer checks his phone 150 times a day. A “mobile addict” is defined as someone who launches apps more than 60 times a day — 10 times as often as the average smartphone user.
The number of addicts is growing rapidly. Flurry Analytics said there were 79 million mobile addicts in March 2013. By March 2014, the number had soared to 176 million. Mobile addicts are growing at a rate five times that of regular users.
And that is causing many people a bit of grief.
A smartphone, for those of you over 55, is a cellphone that is also a mini-computer. It allows people to search the web, run a variety of applications and text (the act of pressing both thumbs against a miniature keypad to bastardize the English language).
According to Psychology Today, “Many suffer from anxiety if they lose their phone, even if only for a few minutes. We rely on it to do everything from saying ‘I love you' to breaking up, from checking bank balances to investing, from sharing photos of the grandchild to sexting. We can carry out a plethora of daily tasks, right from the palm of our hand.”
So important have smartphones become, psychologists have coined a name for the fear of being without them: nomophobia.
Psychology Today cites a list of symptoms: You are anxious whenever your phone is not in your possession. You constantly check your phone for texts and feel compelled to respond immediately. You are halfway to the store, realize you forgot your phone and turn around to go get it.
Some people are suffering from phantom cellphone vibration. This is when they think their phone is vibrating and it turns out to be a false alarm.
Haven't we all encountered a person who is sitting right across from us, but is so focused on checking Facebook or texting friends, he or she doesn't hear a word you say?
Don't get me wrong — technology has brought about awesome improvements to my life. I have quick and easy access to tremendous amounts of information. Thanks to my computer and smartphone, I'm able to make a good living from my home.
But as we continue to gain mastery over our physical world, maybe we need to refocus on our emotional and spiritual worlds.
I think about the way my grandfather lived in the 1920s and '30s. Houses were close together then. Large porches were built on the front, and people sat out at night and talked. On Saturdays, my grandfather and his sisters strolled over to their mother's house. They played cards, sang and told stories.
But today, we shut ourselves inside air-conditioned homes. Our garages are in the front and our porches are hidden in the back. Heck, many neighbors in transient neighborhoods don't know each other or even say “hello.”
And thanks to our smartphones, we further isolate ourselves in the vacuum of cyberspace — communicating electronically with cyberfriends far more often than we do in person.
The Style Blog summarized the problems of smartphone addiction with a quote from Nicholas Carr, author of “The Shallows.”
“The smartphone, more than any other gadget, steals from us the opportunity to maintain our attention, to engage in contemplation and reflection, or even to be alone with our thoughts.”
Technological innovation is a wonderful thing, but we just need to keep an eye on it before it allows us to become dull, detached and less able to enjoy genuine interaction with our fellow human beings.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- NFL coaches weigh in on Polamalu’s legacy
- Penguins slip past Sharks, 3-2, in shootout
- Pirates’ outfield may have few defensive peers
- Penguins’ Letang leaves hospital, out with concussion
- Sex-soaked culture faulted for fraternity house parties
- Hempfield infant fights rare disease
- Penguins notebook: Five defensemen dress against San Jose
- Starkey: Next frontier for Steelers offense
- LaBar: WrestleMania 31 one of the best ever
- Researchers uncover details to help get GOP candidates elected
- Pirates notebook: Decker leaves game with calf injury