Corbett tells convention delegates to look to Pa. for balanced budget model
By Brad Bumsted and Salena Zito
Published: Monday, Aug. 27, 2012, 11:00 a.m.
TAMPA – Gov. Tom Corbett on Monday told Pennsylvania delegates to the Republican National Convention that the federal government needs to do what he did two years in a row in partnership with the Legislature: balance the budget without raising taxes.
“What we have done is balance two budgets on time, without raising taxes on the families of Pennsylvania,” Corbett said. That put Pennsylvania on the path to fiscal stability, he said.
“We need the same thing in our country,” he said. “What we need in America is strong leadership.”
Corbett was speaking at the delegates' first meeting of the convention, an event cut short by one day as Tropical Storm Isaac moves up the Gulf of Mexico toward New Orleans.
The 500 or so people attending from Pennsylvania — 72 of whom are delegates — got the day off as they wait for the now three-day convention to begin Tuesday afternoon.
State party officials scheduled a trip to the Florida Aquarium, where the guests include Corbett and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.
Pennsylvania delegates have criticized Obama for the lack of fiscal stability.
“The president hasn't done a budget in three years,” state Republican Party Chairman Rob Gleason.
In what was largely a pep rally speech to delegates at a breakfast meeting, Corbett said media often ask him whether a Republican, in this case Mitt Romney, can win Pennsylvania.
“Obviously a Republican can win Pennsylvania,” he said, referring to himself and GOP-controlled Senate and House chambers, Corbett said.
The team to put the country back on track fiscally is Romney and Rep. Paul Ryan, his running mate, the governor said, adding he shares their vision for the nation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.