HARRISBURG -- Lt. Gov. James Cawley today will call a special election on Aug. 7 to fill the seat of convicted former state Sen. Jane Orie, R-McCandless, who resigned on Monday.Political parties will choose their candidates to compete in the election for the seat in parts of Allegheny and Butler counties. There is no primary election. The winner becomes the senator to fill Orie's term through 2014.
"After consultations with the governor and Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, I decided to set an early date so that the citizens of that Senate district could have representation as soon as possible. They are entitled to their voice in the Senate," Cawley said.Scarnati said that he was "fully supportive" of Cawley's decision to call a special election on Aug. 7. Orie's replacement would have the "opportunity to cast votes on several important fall issues including pension reform and infrastructure investmen, he said.Orie, 50, represented the North Hills district since she won a special election in 2001. She was re-elected in 2010 while under indictment.Orie, 50, was convicted by an Allegheny County jury in March for using public resources for her campaigns and for forging documents. She will be sentenced on June 4 by Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Manning.
Prosecutors also charged two of her sisters, state Supreme Court Justice Joan Orie Melvin and Janine Orie, who worked as an aide to Melvin when she served on Superior Court. Melvin was elected to the Supreme Court in November 2009. Jane Orie used her staff and state resources for Melvin's campaign.Janine Orie still faces trial.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.