How the delegate system works in Pennsylvania
The Republican and Democratic parties of Pennsylvania allocate some presidential nominating delegates to the winner of the state's April 26 primary, but party rules empower some delegates to “vote their conscience” and choose a candidate.
Most of Pennsylvania's 71 Republican delegates are technically uncommitted. This year, party rules changed to require 14 “at large” delegates selected by party leaders to vote for the winner of the state's primary, but only on the first ballot at the national convention. Three “automatic” delegates — state GOP Chairman Bob Gleason, National Committeeman Bob Asher and National Committeewoman Christine Toretti — are legally bound to vote for the winner on the first ballot only. The remaining 54 delegates, elected by Republican primary voters in each of Pennsylvania's 18 congressional districts — three per district — are uncommitted.
Each congressional district has “pledged” delegates whose names appear on the primary ballot and have declared their support for a particular candidate. Pledged delegates are awarded to candidates on a proportional basis that hinges on the results of the primary.
The number of delegates per congressional district is based on a formula that takes into account voter turnout in the past three presidential elections. In total, 127 delegates will be selected this way. Candidates can accept or reject individual delegates.
There is also a measure to ensure that the pledged delegates are equally split by gender.
There are 62 additional at-large delegates who are selected by state party leadership. They are proportionally allocated to candidates who receive at least 15 percent of the vote statewide.
In addition, there are 21 super delegates who are free to vote for any candidate. Pennsylvania has a total of 210 Democratic delegates.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.