ShareThis Page

Judge bumps McKees Rocks Republican off ballot in Allegheny County Council primary

Theresa Clift
| Monday, March 27, 2017, 4:33 p.m.
Pat Catena is sworn in to Allegheny County Council Tuesday, January 17. He will serve in the District 4 seat vacated by Michael Finnerty until November.
Theresa Clift | Tribune - Review
Pat Catena is sworn in to Allegheny County Council Tuesday, January 17. He will serve in the District 4 seat vacated by Michael Finnerty until November.

A McKees Rocks Republican seeking a seat on Allegheny County Council will be kept off the ballot because he broke rules in gathering signatures, an Allegheny County judge ruled.

Dimitrios Pantzoulas filed papers hoping to win the GOP primary and run against Pat Catena, D-Carnegie, in the general election. Council members appointed Catena in January to replace former Councilman Michael Finnerty, who stepped down, in District 4.

A woman circulating petitions for Pantzoulas was not a qualified elector, Allegheny County Common Pleas Senior Judge Joseph M. James ruled last week.

Pantzoulas has an option to appeal the decision, but he had not done so as of Monday afternoon, said Kathy Lederman, James' law clerk.

District 4 covers Carnegie, McKees Rocks, Scott, South Fayette, Robinson and other municipalities.

There are no other candidates vying for Catena's seat.

The only contested council primary race is in District 12, where Banksville Democrat Robert Palmosina is challenging incumbent Jim Ellenbogen, D-Banksville.

Councilmen Ed Kress, R-Shaler, and Charles Martoni, D-Swissvale, will face challengers in the general election Nov. 7.

The deadline to file to run as an independent is Aug. 1.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669 or tclift@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.