ShareThis Page

White House said to be weighing new role for press secretary Sean Spicer

| Monday, June 19, 2017, 6:18 p.m.
Sean Spicer has served as President Donald Trump’s press secretary since the beginning of the administration in January. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Sean Spicer has served as President Donald Trump’s press secretary since the beginning of the administration in January. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON — The White House is weighing whether to move press secretary Sean Spicer into a more senior role focused on strategy and bring in a new spokesman for the president, two people familiar with the discussions said.

Spicer has served as President Trump's press secretary since the beginning of the administration in January. It's been the subject of speculation for months that he was on the verge of being fired. The discussions on reorganizing the White House communications operation are still preliminary and no final decision has been made, the people said.

The president has both praised and castigated Spicer for his performances at the briefing room podium but has never told him he was in danger of being fired.

In recent weeks, a number of Spicer's question-and-answer sessions with reporters have been conducted off-camera, including on Monday. Earlier in the administration, the briefings were a major draw for political junkies, often broadcast live in their entirety on cable news networks.

His performances inspired a scathing parody by “Saturday Night Live,” with actress Melissa McCarthy delivering a gender-bending portrayal of the press secretary as a short, shrill buffoon.

Spicer often found himself caught between striving for the respect of a deeply skeptical White House press corps, who demanded that he be as clear and transparent as possible, and an erratic boss with a penchant for going off-message on Twitter without giving prior notice to his staff.

Spicer had stumbles of his own. He caused an uproar in April when he claimed that Adolf Hitler, who gassed millions of Jews, “didn't even sink to using chemical weapons.” Spicer was attempting to condemn Syrian President Bashar Assad for using chemical weapons and tried to clarify that he understood Hitler had brought Jews “into the Holocaust centers.” He later apologized.

Spicer has weathered intense speculation about his job security, which peaked after Trump's May 9 firing of FBI Director James Comey. The announcement was made without any supporting communications plan, such as arranging surrogates who would defend the decision on cable television.

Spicer avoided on-the-record interviews about the firing for hours. The Washington Post published a story that said he “spent several minutes hidden in the bushes” outside the White House before agreeing to brief gathered reporters. Spicer later expressed frustration that other reporters who had observed the scene didn't come to his defense and explain that he was talking with someone on a sidewalk hemmed by shrubbery, not literally hiding in bushes.

The next day, Spicer was absent from the briefing room podium, giving rise to more speculation about his job. He was fulfilling long-scheduled Navy Reserve duty requirements, but much of the external blame for the Comey fiasco fell on him, for failing to have a strategic sense of the extent of the fallout.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.