ShareThis Page

Republicans, Democrats fight over funding children's health insurance

| Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2017, 9:03 p.m.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore.: 'Congress must get a CHIP bill to the president's desk as soon as possible. Every day that goes by without action means more harmful consequences for families and states.'
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore.: 'Congress must get a CHIP bill to the president's desk as soon as possible. Every day that goes by without action means more harmful consequences for families and states.'

WASHINGTON — Republicans pushed a bill extending financing for a popular health insurance program for children through a House committee Wednesday, but partisan divisions over how to pay for it suggest that congressional approval will take time despite growing pressure on lawmakers to act.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee approved the measure on a party-line 28-23 vote. The program covers 8.9 million low-income children, and a renewal of money for it seems virtually inevitable.

But four days after the program's federal funding expired, the bill's problems were underscored as Democrats opposed GOP plans for financing the extension and a related community health center bill.

The GOP cuts include trimming a public health fund established under former President Obama's health care law and making it harder for people buying individual health coverage to avoid paying premiums. They would also raise Medicare premiums on seniors earning more than $500,000 annually, make it harder for lottery winners to qualify for Medicaid and strengthen how the government gets reimbursements from private insurers.

New Jersey Rep. Frank Pallone, the committee's top Democrat, said the dispute could delay congressional action until the end of the year. He accused the GOP of trying to "continue their ongoing sabotage of the Affordable Care Act," Obama's 2010 law.

"While some have called these offsets partisan, we would call them reasonable," said panel chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore.

No states are expected to immediately run out of money to cover children because they can continue using unspent money.

But some are projected to deplete their money before year's end and are poised to take early steps like notifying beneficiaries that the program might be curtailed. Neither party wants to be seen as jeopardizing it.

A similar bill won easy approval earlier Wednesday from the Senate Finance Committee, but that measure had no provisions to pay for the extension after the panel's leaders failed to reach agreement. Without a deal, Democrats could force Republicans to get 60 votes to move the measure through the Senate, giving them leverage.

In a further complexity, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. said he wants the children's health measure to include federal subsidies to insurers for easing costs for low-earning customers. Some senators are seeking a bipartisan deal on that but many Republicans oppose that effort.

The bill would provide nearly $120 billion over the next five years. Less than half that amount is expected to actually be spent, and lawmakers will have to finance only around $8 billion because of Congress' budget rules.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has not said when the full Senate would consider the measure. The chamber takes a recess next week and the House takes one the following week, and final congressional action seems unlikely until at least late October if not later.

The federal government bears most of the program's cost, with states paying the rest.

MACPAC, a nonpartisan agency that advises lawmakers, has projected that Arizona, Minnesota, North Carolina and the District of Columbia would run dry by December, the first states to do so.

By the end of March 2018, more than half the states would deplete their funds, the agency estimated.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.