ShareThis Page

Former ethics adviser files complaint against Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway

| Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2017, 8:24 p.m.

WASHINGTON – The dispute over Roy Moore's Senate campaign has now led to a legal complaint against White House adviser Kellyanne Conway.

Walter Shaub, a former government ethics official and frequent critic of President Trump, said Conway's comments about Moore's Democratic challenger Doug Jones may be a violation of the Hatch Act, which forbids federal employees from getting involved in elections. Shaub said he filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel.

"She's standing in front of the White House. It seems pretty clear she was appearing in her official capacity when she advocated against a candidate," tweeted Shaub, who earlier this year left his job as director of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics.

During a Fox News interview on Tuesday, Conway said: "I just want everybody to know Doug Jones, nobody ever says his name and they pretend that he's some kind of conservative Democrat in Alabama and he's not."

The White House pushed back on the idea that Conway used her official position to weigh in on the election.

"Ms. Conway did not advocate for or against the election of a candidate, and specifically declined to encourage Alabamans to vote a certain way," Raj Shah, principal deputy White House press secretary, said in a statement.

"She was speaking about issues and her support for the President's agenda," Shah continued. "This election is for the people of Alabama to decide."

In an apparent response to Shaub on Twitter, Conway said her comments mirrored those of President Trump.

"I addressed Doug Jones," Conway said. "I did not address Roy Moore. Let Alabama choose its representatives."

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel, which handles Hatch Act cases, has previously flagged statements by Conway as possible ethics violations.

Earlier this year, Conway spoke on Fox News from the White House briefing room and urged viewers to "go buy Ivanka's stuff" – appearing to endorse the fashion line by Trump's daughter. Ethics rules prohibit government officials from using their positions to to endorse any product or service.

Richard Painter, former ethics lawyer for president George W. Bush, agreed that Conway appeared to violate the Hatch Act "by using her position to take sides in a partisan election."

That, he tweeted, "is a firing offense. And for her this is strike two."

The Office of Government Ethics reprimanded her after she went on national television in February and promoted Ivanka Trump products after a number of retailers stopped hawking her fashion line.

"Go buy Ivanka's stuff is what I would tell you," Conway said at the time. "I'm going to give a free commercial here. Go buy it today, everybody."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.