ShareThis Page

Sen. Dianne Feinstein says an obstruction of justice against Trump is building

| Sunday, Dec. 3, 2017, 5:48 p.m.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., leaves the Senate chamber after a vote at the Capitol Dec. 1, 2017 in Washington.
Getty Images
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., leaves the Senate chamber after a vote at the Capitol Dec. 1, 2017 in Washington.

WASHINGTON — A Senate investigation into connections between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election suggests that a potential case of obstruction of justice is developing against the president, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Sunday.

"What we're beginning to see is the putting together of a case of obstruction of justice," Feinstein, D-Calif., the ranking minority member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said about the committee's investigation.

"We see this in the indictments, the four indictments, and pleas that have just taken place, and some of the comments that are being made," said Feinstein, who is also a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. "I see it in the hyper-frenetic attitude of the White House: the comments every day, the continual tweets."

Feinstein, on NBC's "Meet the Press," was referring to former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and his associate Rick Gates, who face charges including money laundering in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation; former campaign adviser George Papadopoulos; and former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Papadopoulos and Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI.

Feinstein said the most important instance was Trump's firing of FBI Director James Comey, which she believes was "directly because he did not agree to 'lift the cloud' of the Russia investigation" as he said Trump requested.

"That's obstruction of justice," Feinstein said.

Feinstein said her concern about the Trump White House "rises with the day" and hit a tipping point about a month ago. "There is a kind of instability, unpredictability," she said. "It's one issue after the other."

In a statement released Friday, Feinstein called Flynn's guilty plea on Friday regarding his conversations with Russians a "stunning revelation."

"This shows a Trump associate negotiating with the Russians against U.S. policy and interests before Donald Trump took office and after it was announced that Russia had interfered in our election," Feinstein said in the statement.

Asked Sunday on NBC whether Trump is a target of the investigation, Feinstein said she assumes that "many in the White House are under investigation in this" and that she doesn't believe that Flynn "was a rogue agent."

"I think he had to have been directed," Feinstein said. "Now whether the special counsel can find that evidence or not, whether we can, I don't know yet. But I see that that's where this is going."

Also on "Meet the Press," Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said Mueller's investigation was "making progress."

Collins, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said she didn't know whether there was collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, "but what we do know is there were conversations during the transition period."

There's only one president during the transition period and that was Barack Obama, so those conversations "should not have been taking place, but that does not confirm collusion," Collins said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.