Lawmakers argue over memo redactions as they await Trump's decision on Democrats' rebuttal
WASHINGTON — Lawmakers are confident President Trump will allow the release of Democrats' rebuttal to a GOP memo alleging federal law enforcement abused its surveillance authority, and have begun arguing over which party should be blamed for redactions the government has yet to make.
Democrats have warned the president against scrubbing any more classified information from their document than what the FBI and Justice Department recommend, saying the context is necessary to refute the GOP's allegations. Their 10-page memo includes more classified information than the four-page GOP memo the House Intelligence Committee made fully public on Friday.
Rep. Jackie Speier says she thinks President Trump may heavily redact the Democrats' memo. 'He does not want to have the book report that was the Republican proposal of 3 pages compared to what is the equivalent of a 10-page postgrad dissertation.' https://t.co/vnVquvc4Xz pic.twitter.com/ooEYMvnZpi— CNN (@CNN) February 7, 2018
House Republicans say they suspect the Democrats of designing their memo to require so many redactions that they can later accuse Trump of muzzling their rebuttal for political purposes.
"You have to hand it to them; they set themselves up in a really great position," said Rep. K. Michael Conaway, R-Texas, who is running the House Intelligence Committee's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and whether any of Trump's associates coordinated with the Kremlin. "The other side will be able to say, 'Well something politically was redacted out of there,' and how do you prove that being wrong? Because it's stuff we can't tell people about."
Members of both parties acknowledge that at least some of the secret information in the Democrats' document must be blacked out before it can be released to the public, to protect intelligence sources and methods. On Tuesday, the intelligence committee's top Democrat, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., surmised that the Republicans' stating their concerns could be an effort to help the president make additional changes.
"I'm not surprised they would like things omitted from our response," he said.
House GOP appears unlikely to stand in Trump's way if he decides to redact or block Schiff memo; many are mum about overriding Trump. Meantime, BURR says this of Nunes memo: 'I don't think there was any need for a memo to be released.' story w/ @jeremyherb https://t.co/w1XLf9VMEN— Manu Raju (@mkraju) February 7, 2018
Tuesday's dispute suggests the partisan sniping that began last month when Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee unveiled their memo will continue regardless of whether Trump decides to release the Democrats' rebuttal.
White House Chief of Staff John Kelly told reporters in the Capitol that he had given White House lawyers a deadline of "no later than Thursday" to complete their evaluation of the Democrats' memo so they could then recommend a course of action.
"This is not as clean a memo as the first one," Kelly said.
Trump met with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Tuesday to discuss the Democrats' rebuttal and how it differs from the GOP memo he approved last week without changes. The dueling memos both focus on an aspect of the Russia investigation that has divided the parties: a now-famous dossier alleging that Trump had personal and financial ties to Russia, and the extent to which the dossier influenced law enforcement's decision to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
The GOP memo suggests that the dossier's author, former British spy Christopher Steele, passed questionable information about Page to the FBI and Justice Department. The information is suspect, the GOP says, because Steele's work was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign — facts, they say, that were not disclosed to the court responsible for approving surveillance warrants.
Democrats defend the FBI's work and have disputed the dossier's overall importance in the warrant-approval process. The surveillance court was told that Steele could have political motivations, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
Schiff shared the Democrats' document with the FBI and the Justice Department last week, hoping to compare their recommendations against anything the White House may approve. He excoriated Nunes for refusing to more closely involve either agency in reviewing the GOP memo before its release.
Nunes has defended his decisions and actions, telling fellow Republicans on Tuesday that the truth is on the GOP's side, according to members in the room.
Republicans initially unconcerned by the Democrats' memo are increasingly worried the parties' disputes will worsen.
"I honestly think that most of it is fine ... but I've heard Schiff start to say that, you know, he's already anticipating [the White House] redacting a lot of stuff in it," said Rep. Thomas Rooney, R-Fla., who is helping Conaway to run the intelligence panel's Russia probe. "When he says stuff like that, you literally can't win. You're like in an abusive relationship."