ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Giuliani says he won't go on TV with Stormy Daniels' lawyer because he doesn't debate 'pimps'

| Friday, May 11, 2018, 8:54 p.m.
Latest appointee to President Donald Trump's legal team and former Mayor of New York City  Rudy Giuliani takes questions from the media after speaking  at the Conference on Iran on May 5, 2018 in Washington, DC.  (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)
Getty Images
Latest appointee to President Donald Trump's legal team and former Mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani takes questions from the media after speaking at the Conference on Iran on May 5, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

NEW YORK - Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said Friday that he won't debate Michael Avenatti because he doesn't keep company with "pimps."

Giuliani made the slur about Stormy Daniels' lawyer during an interview with Business Insider, responding to Avenatti's request this week to have an on-air discussion about his client's defamation suit against President Donald Trump.

"It would be very helpful for the public to witness a discussion between Mr. Giuliani and me concerning the facts of the case," Avenatti said Tuesday in a Twitter post. "I am willing to participate on any network provided both sides are provided a fair shake. I am also willing to do it on 12-hrs notice."

But Giuliani, who's the latest addition to Trump's legal team, wouldn't have any of it.

"I don't get involved with pimps," Giuliani said. "The media loves to give him room because he makes these roundabout charges and they turn out to mean nothing. I think he's going to get himself in serious trouble."

Avenatti fired off a sticking-to-his-guns response.

"Hey Rudy - it turns out I'm not the only 'pimp' you have experience with," Avenatti posted on Twitter with a widely circulated 2000 skit video of Giuliani dressed in drag and receiving a kiss on the cheek from Trump. "History evidently is repeating itself."

Avenatti represents Daniels, 39, in two separate lawsuits against Trump and his longtime personal attorney, Michael Cohen.

The first suit seeks Daniels' release from a Cohen-facilitated agreement barring her from speaking publicly about allegedly having sex with Trump in 2006. The second suit argues that Trump has defamed Daniels by denying her claim that a mystery man threatened to hurt her and her baby daughter if she didn't stop talking about Trump.

Giuliani further argued he wouldn't debate Avenatti because "it wouldn't be fair."

"I debate, like, really intelligent, skilled people," he said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me