ShareThis Page
Political Headlines

Paul Ryan says no proof FBI spied on Trump campaign

| Wednesday, June 6, 2018, 7:51 p.m.
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., is agreeing with another senior House Republican who says there’s no evidence that the FBI planted a 'spy' on President Trump's 2016 campaign. The comments contradict Trump, who has insisted the agency planted a 'spy for political reasons and to help Crooked Hillary win.'
J. Scott Applewhite | AP
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., is agreeing with another senior House Republican who says there’s no evidence that the FBI planted a 'spy' on President Trump's 2016 campaign. The comments contradict Trump, who has insisted the agency planted a 'spy for political reasons and to help Crooked Hillary win.'

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Paul Ryan has joined those disputing President Trump's assertion that federal law enforcement planted a spy inside his campaign, telling reporters Wednesday that he has seen "no evidence" to support such claims.

Ryan, R-Wis., described as "accurate" an initial assessment offered last week by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Oversight Committee, who told Fox News that "the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do" in investigating information alleging certain Trump campaign advisers had suspicious ties to Russia.

"I think Chairman Gowdy's initial assessment is accurate," Ryan said, adding that "we have some more digging to do. We're waiting for some more document requests. ... We still have some unanswered questions.

"But I have seen no evidence to the contrary of the initial assessment that Chairman Gowdy has made," Ryan continued. "But I want to make sure that we run every lead down and make sure we get final answers to these questions. I'll leave it at that."

Trump branded the controversy "Spygate" after one of his top allies in Congress, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., demanded a briefing last month from top FBI and Justice Department officials about a confidential source, Stefan Halper, who made contact with members of Trump's campaign. Trump and Nunes have attacked both agencies over their handling of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

After much squabbling, the intelligence panel's top Democrat, Rep. Adam Schiff, Calif., also attended the briefing about Halper. The Gang of Eight — a group of lawmakers that includes the Republican and Democratic leadership in the House and Senate, as well as the top Republicans and Democrats on the Intelligence committees — was given the same briefing later that afternoon. Ryan and Gowdy attended the first briefing with Nunes and Schiff.

Following Ryan's comments Wednesday, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., told CNN that he also endorses Gowdy's take on the evidence.

"I think that Trey Gowdy's description of the process was correct," Burr said, according to CNN, though he left open the possibility that Trump may not be referring to Halper when he alleges his campaign was infiltrated.

Ryan was careful Wednesday not to disparage all of Nunes's complaints with the Justice Department, a list of grievances that includes several unfulfilled demands for documents unrelated to the spying accusations. Democrats maintain Nunes is determined to undermine the law enforcement agencies and, by extension, the foundations of special counsel Robert Mueller III's investigation into whether Trump's campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the election's outcome.

Ryan's announcement appeared to surprise some fellow Republicans pushing for release of that information. Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., who has floated the possibility of impeaching Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees Mueller's probe, declined to comment on Ryan's take until after he had spoken directly with the speaker.

Ryan also shot a careful retort at Trump's assertion this week that, as president, he is entitled to pardon himself should Mueller's probe unearth evidence of crimes. At the same time, Trump said that he had done nothing wrong.

"I don't know the technical answer to that question," said Ryan, who is not a lawyer. "But I think obviously the answer is, he shouldn't and no one is above the law."

Republicans reacted harshly to Trump's statements about his power to pardon himself, warning that such a move would be unwise and an abuse of power. They've suggested, too, that he seek better legal advice.

Democrats also have eyed the Trump legal team warily. On Tuesday, Democratic members of the Gang of Eight sent a letter to the top officials at the FBI and the Justice Department seeking assurances that neither the president nor any members of his staff or legal team had or would be briefed on the classified information pertaining to the FBI's confidential informant, "outside of an appropriate judicial proceeding."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me