Kerrey's comeback bid gains some momentum
Republican Deb Fischer and Democrat Bob Kerrey, Senate candidates from Nebraska, hold their second debate on Sept. 28 in Omaha, Neb. AP
Photo by AP
OMAHA — A Nebraska U.S. Senate race that once appeared headed for a blowout has gotten newfound attention with a frenzy of spending on political ads and some polls showing the race could be tightening.
With less than a week to go before Election Day, Republican Deb Fischer is banking on her association with the state's most popular Republicans — including Gov. Dave Heineman and U.S. Sen. Mike Johanns. She has tried to tie opponent Bob Kerrey to President Obama and other national Democrats in the deeply conservative state.
Kerrey is fighting back with a nod to Nebraska's history of electing conservative-leaning Democrats by reaching out to Republican and independent voters. His campaign has focused on voters' frustration with partisan gridlock in Congress and has promised to be a legislator who can reach across the aisle to solve spiraling national debt and salvage Social Security and Medicare.
That claim was bolstered with reports that Kerrey garnered the the endorsement of former GOP Sen. Chuck Hagel, a fellow Vietnam veteran.
Between the two candidates is a new rush of ads funded by hundreds of thousands of dollars by outside groups hoping to determine the outcome of the race.
“I think the thing that says is, where a few months ago many Republicans nationally were not taking the Kerrey candidacy very seriously, now they're taking it very seriously,” said Randall Adkins, political science professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.