Challenger concedes Arizona race to Giffords' former aide
PHOENIX — Republican Martha McSally on Saturday conceded defeat in her hard-fought race against Democratic U.S. Rep. Ron Barber, bringing closure to Arizona's final pending congressional election and giving Democrats a five-to-four advantage in the state's House delegation in the next Congress.
Barber's narrow victory in southern Arizona's 2nd Congressional District helps him emerge from the shadow of his former boss and predecessor, former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, by giving him a full, two-year House term of his own. It means that for only the second time since the mid-1960s, Democrats will outnumber Republicans in Arizona's new nine-member U.S. House delegation. Republicans overall, however, are in the majority in the House.
In an interview with The Arizona Republic, the triumphant Barber, 67, said he is eager to return to Washington to work on a “grand bargain” that would allow Congress to avoid deep cuts in spending on defense and other priorities and to tackle other legislative challenges.
Although Barber was supported by Giffords and was viewed by many as the frontrunner, McSally proved to be an unexpectedly formidable rival.
The photo finish came as a surprise and should serve as a wake-up call for Barber, said Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia.
“It means that Barber has to redouble his efforts for 2014, assuming that he's running again,” Sabato said.
Barber is Giffords' former district director, who won a special election in June to complete her unfinished third term. Giffords resigned Jan. 25 to focus on recovering from a Jan. 8, 2011, shooting rampage at a constituent event outside a grocery store.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.