Embattled Tenn. lawmaker vows to remain in office
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. — Rep. Scott DesJarlais has told a newspaper that his views about abortion have evolved after previously supporting his ex-wife's decisions to abort pregnancies during their marriage.
The Republican physician from Jasper who now opposes abortion also says he has no plans to resign over revelations about past relationships with patients.
DesJarlais told The Knoxville News Sentinel that he deeply regrets past relationships with multiple women, including patients and co-workers.
He made his first extensive remarks since divorce records from 2001 were released that substantiated claims by Democratic opponents that he urged a lover to get an abortion and used a gun to intimidate his ex-wife.
DesJarlais was re-elected on Nov. 6. He told the newspaper that he intends to run again in two years and he hopes that voters will weigh his job in Congress and not judge him on his past.
“I am human,” he said during an interview with the newspaper. “I don't think I ever put myself out there to be somebody that was perfect. I put myself out there as somebody who wanted to serve the public.”
He added, “I will serve as long as the people want me to serve.”
In court records, DesJarlais said the first abortion with his ex-wife occurred when she was on an experimental drug that created potential risks for the pregnancy. He said the second abortion occurred while the couple was having problems in the relationship.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.