Haley has no rules for appointee
COLUMBIA, S.C. — South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley said she won't make her appointee to the Senate promise not to run for the seat in 2014.
While Haley still hasn't said whom she is considering for the seat left open by the resignation of Jim DeMint at the end of the year, she sent out another news release on Monday narrowing her parameters.
“I do not want to tie the next U.S. senator from South Carolina's hands regarding future office,” Haley said. “I do not want to deprive our state's citizens of the chance to render their judgment on the appointee's performance by way of their vote.”
Haley said on Friday that she would not run for the Senate in 2014 and wouldn't arrange to have herself appointed to replace DeMint.
The governor said she thinks the best way to give the person she chooses a chance to do the best job is to not put any restrictions on the appointment.
“While I am an avid supporter of term limits, I do not want the effectiveness of our state's new U.S. senator to be undermined by the fact that he or she will automatically be leaving the office such a very short time after assuming it,” Haley said.
DeMint announced he will resign from the Senate at the end of the year to take over the leadership of The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Haley's appointee will take over through 2014, when an election will be held for the final two years of DeMint's term.
Several names have emerged as possibilities for the seat, including U.S. Reps. Tim Scott, Mick Mulvaney and Jeff Duncan — three congressmen recently re-elected to a second term. The fourth member of that class, U.S. Rep. Trey Gowdy, has taken his name out of consideration.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.