Barney Frank wants to be an interim senator for Massachusetts
NEWTON, MA - NOVEMBER 28: U.S. Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) walks away from the podium after announcing he will not seek re-election at Newton City Hall November 28, 2011 in Newton, Massachusetts. Frank is a 16-term Democrat who last year helped pass the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. (Photo by Darren McCollester/Getty Images)
Photo by Getty Images
BOSTON — He's been out of Congress for one day, but retirement doesn't seem to suit former Rep. Barney Frank.
“A month ago, or a few weeks ago, I said I wasn't interested,” Frank said on MSNBC's “Morning Joe.” “But (the “fiscal cliff” deal) now means that February, March and April are going to be among the most important months in American financial history.”
The longtime Democratic congressman from Massachusetts told The Associated Press that he asked Gov. Deval Patrick to appoint him to serve as the state's interim senator until a special election is held to fill John Kerry's seat, which will be vacant if Kerry gets Senate approval for secretary of State.
Patrick confirmed Friday that he was considering Frank and believed he would make a “great interim senator,” but said he had talked to other people about the position.
“I'm very well suited to do it,” Frank said. “You're not going to have a long period to get acquainted with things.”
Frank said he wouldn't run for Kerry's seat in a special election.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.