Rove's venture into GOP primaries enrages Tea Party
WASHINGTON — Leaders of the anti-tax Tea Party are fuming about plans by some Republican strategists to use the party's wealthy donors to help “electable” candidates win primary races.
Jonathan Collegio, a spokesman for Conservative Victory Project, said in an e-mail on Monday that Republicans lost some Senate races last year and in 2010 because of “undisciplined candidates running bad campaigns.” The group “seeks to help elect the most conservative candidates in Republican primaries who can win in general elections.”
Leaders of the Tea Party and other GOP groups that oppose abortion and gay rights responded by calling political strategist Karl Rove, a founder of the project, a “fake conservative” who had “declared war” on the Tea Party.
The victory project was attacked as “Orwellian” by Matt Kibbe, the head of the Washington-based FreedomWorks, which identifies itself as a “grassroots” Tea Party booster.
Rove's group “is created with the sole operating mission of blocking the efforts of fiscally conservative activists across the country,” Kibbe said, according to the FreedomWorks blog.
If neither side backs down, the rift could lead to more costly Republican primary fights with the victors forced to quickly recover as they confront Democrats in the general election.
“Their idea of the most electable presidential candidate was Mitt Romney, and before him John McCain and before him Bob Dole,” said Brent Bozell, the leader of For America, a social media group that identifies its goals as promoting limited government, national defense and values.
“These fake conservatives need to go away before they do more damage,” he said in an e-mail and blog post, referring to those behind the victory project.
Rove was a top strategist for George W. Bush, and Bozell and others have argued that the GOP has suffered from its propensity to back “moderate” candidates such as Bush.
Teaparty.org, a social media group that aggregates information about the anti-tax movement, posted a headline on its blog: “Rove Declares War on Tea Party.”
Erick Erickson, editor of the website Redstate.com, wrote that Rove's venture would “crush conservatives, destroy the Tea Party, and put a bunch of squishes in Republican leadership positions.”
Rove helped build American Crossroads, a super-political action committee, and its companion nonprofit, Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies, into the biggest-spending outside group of the 2012 federal elections. The two groups invested more than $175 million in last year's elections, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a Washington-based group that tracks campaign finance.
The Crossroads groups spent more than $127 million on 82,000 television spots to help Romney in his unsuccessful bid to topple President Obama, according to Kantar Media's CMAG, an ad tracker based in New York. In Senate races, 10 of the 12 candidates they supported were defeated and four of the nine House candidates they backed lost their races.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Opposing defenses find success against Steelers by eschewing blitz
- Penguins forward Downie becoming a hit with teammates
- Steelers looking for Spence to step up game at inside linebacker
- Western Pennsylvania residents chill about forecasters’ spat
- Pittsburgh wins Gawker.com ugliest accent tourney n’at
- Shale oil, gas finds put Mon Valley on path to renaissance, leaders say
- Steelers’ Brown made good after leaving PSU in wake of sanctions
- Legal titans prepared to tussle in Ferrante cyanide homicide trial
- Snapshot in time: Comparing Cowher, Tomlin drafts
- Large-scale batteries are integral in shift to renewable energy
- Crash closes road in Dunbar