Share This Page

Palin delights CPAC with zingers

| Saturday, March 16, 2013, 8:30 p.m.
Getty Images
NATIONAL HARBOR, MD - MARCH 16: Sarah Palin, former Governor of Alaska, holds up a large soda as she speaks about New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposed large soda ban, at the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) March 16, 2013 in National Harbor, Maryland. The American Conservative Union held its annual conference in the suburb of Washington, DC to rally conservatives and generate ideas. (Photo by Pete Marovich/Getty Images) *** BESTPIX ***

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin delivered a blistering attack on President Obama on Saturday, using a string of one-liners to rile up a raucous crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference in suburban Washington.

“Barack Obama promised the most transparent administration ever. Barack Obama: You lie!” she said.

Palin's jabs were met with standing ovations. The response made clear that she maintains huge political capital with the conservative base.

She took aim at the president for his and the first lady's many appearances on television.

“Remember no-drama Obama? If only. Now it's all-drama Obama,” Palin said. “We don't have leadership coming out of Washington. We have reality television. Except it's really bad TV, and America tuned out a long time ago.”

Turning to guns, Palin criticized the background-checks bill that passed through a Senate committee last week and Obama's push for gun control.

“More background checks?” Palin said. “Dandy idea, Mr. President. Shoulda started with yours.”

Obama was the biggest target of Palin's speech, though, and she got her biggest applause lines when she took on the incumbent president, often addressing him directly.

“You won. We get it. Now step away from the teleprompter and do your job,” she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.