Share This Page

Pittsburgh mayor's race looks to be in the hands of only a few voters

| Tuesday, May 21, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh mayoral candidate Jake Wheatley greets potential voters (from left)India Burkes, Dana Williams and Joyce Barr along Centre Avenue in the Hill District on Monday May 20, 2013.
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh mayoral candidate Jack Wagner meets with voters at the Mount Washington Senior Center during a busy day of campaigning ahead of Tuesday's election. Wagner was defeated by Bill Peduto.
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Jack Wagner meets with voters on Monday, May 21, 2013, in the Mt. Washington Senior Center during a busy day of campaigning ahead of the Pittsburgh mayoral election.
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh mayoral candidate Bill Peduto rallies his supporters at a kick-off for his 'Clean Sweep' tour Monday, May 21, 2013 in the portico of the City County Building, Downtown. Peduto then climbed aboard a street sweeper to ride through town campaigning.
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Mayoral candidate Bill Peduto rallies his supporters from a street sweeper at a kick-off for his 'Clean Sweep' tour Monday May 21, 2013 to ride through town campaigning.

Fewer than half of Pittsburgh's registered voters will cast ballots on Tuesday in an election that will virtually determine the next mayor, political observers predict.

Mark Wolosik, manager of the Allegheny County Elections Division, said he expects about 40 percent Democratic turnout in the city. Party officials think Wolosik is dreaming.

Nancy Mills, who chairs the Allegheny County Democratic Committee, and Jim Roddey, who chairs the Republican Committee, think turnout will be closer to 20 percent.

“I think 35,0000 votes will win the election,” Roddey said. “That means a little over 10 percent of the population (of 307,000) will select the mayor. It also means 90 percent of the people living in the city of Pittsburgh will get a mayor they didn't vote for.”

Campaigns for the leading Democratic mayoral candidates, City Councilman Bill Peduto and former state Auditor General Jack Wagner, said they would run telephone banks, go door-to-door and rent vans to get voters to polls. Both hoped for a high turnout.

“I think it's a pretty hotly contested race, and that will drive voter turnout,” Wolosik said.

In addition to Peduto, 48, of Point Breeze and Wagner, 65, of Beechview, state Rep. Jake Wheatley, 41, of the Hill District and community activist A.J. Richardson, 36, of Sheraden are seeking the Democratic nomination. Republican Josh Wander, 42, of Squirrel Hill is running unopposed for the Republicans' nod.

Pittsburgh residents shun primaries, even though they typically determine the next officeholder because of voter registration disparities. There are 164,741 registered Democrats in the city, compared with 30,502 Republicans. Pittsburgh has not had a Republican mayor since the Great Depression.

Only 26.6 percent of city Democrats turned out in 2009 for the last mayoral primary, down from 38.8 percent in 2005 and 39.6 percent in 2001.

Allegheny County totals are worse.

Last year's presidential primary drew 19.4 percent of 888,686 registered voters, and the county has averaged about 23 percent voter turnout in primaries over the last four election cycles.

The county will spend about $914,000 on this primary, not including staff salaries and warehouse rentals. If only 23 percent of 879,183 registered voters turn out, the cost will equate to about $4.50 per person.

Political observers have mixed opinions on whether higher turnout helps Peduto or Wagner, the two front-runners in recent polling.

Gerald Shuster, a University of Pittsburgh political analyst, said a large turnout among voters 50 and younger helps Peduto because he appeals to a younger demographic. More seniors voting would translate to more votes for Wagner, he said.

“This is the time of year when the weather keeps people away, strangely enough,” Shuster said. “It's not that it's snowy and cold; it's that it's so nice. People have things to do, and voting is the last of their priorities for the day.”

Voter apathy, unfamiliarity with candidates in a municipal election and feelings that all politicians are corrupt hinder voting in primaries, political observers said.

Other democracies, which tend to hold only one election per year, attract a larger percentage of voters, according to FairVote, a Maryland-based nonpartisan nonprofit, which seeks greater voter participation and fair representation in elections.

Turnout is 70 to 75 percent in Canada and more than 80 percent in most other democracies, according to the organization.

“We ask people to vote a lot more often than other countries,” said Executive Director Rob Richie. “We don't have the mix of parties out there that can be sort of galvanizing to people. Other countries have more parties. That's often sort of a key factor. There's just more people actively engaged in that on an institutional basis.”

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or bbauder@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.