'Constitutional populist' may try to grab GOP nomination for governor
HARRISBURG — An unemployed former disc jockey who bills himself a “constitutional populist” is trying to gather support to win the Republican nomination for governor next year.
Tom Lineaweaver, 57, of Myerstown in Lebanon County said he won't make a decision until January, when he evaluates whether he has the volunteers needed to oppose incumbent Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, 64, of Shaler in May.
He said in an interview that he will need help setting up a campaign finance committee to raise money for the contest.
“I'd like to win,” Lineaweaver said as Corbett formally began his re-election campaign in Pittsburgh. “I know I have a slim chance.”
He is posting about his candidacy on Facebook.
“I'm getting support every day,” said Lineaweaver, who has worked as a dishwasher and taxi driver.
Lineaweaver accused Corbett of being a proponent of “big government.”
As an example, Lineaweaver cited Corbett's plan to expand Medicaid, even though Corbett filed a lawsuit to overturn Obamacare when he was state attorney general.
“He is taking (federal) money from Obama,” Lineaweaver said.
The Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare last year upheld the law but allowed states to accept or reject an expanded Medicaid program. Corbett proposed using federal money to buy private insurance for the poor, requiring them to provide proof of a job search or job training and pay toward premiums. His plan requires federal approval.
Lineaweaver says he has had numerous medical issues since the 1970s. Though he rails against “entitlement” programs, Lineaweaver said he receives Supplemental Security Income for a disability. “I don't like it,” he said, adding he has no choice.
Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media's state Capitol reporter. Reach him at 717-787-1405 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.