TribLIVE

| Politics


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Casey, Toomey expect to maintain cooperation in midst of filibuster upheaval

ASSOCIATED PRESS
Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., left, and Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., shake hands at the conclusion of a news conference at Urban Outfitters' offices in 2011 in Philadelphia.

Off Road Politics connects Washington with Main Street hosted by Salena Zito and Lara Brown PhD. Exclusive radio show on @TribLIVE

Podcasts
  • Loading...
Friday, Nov. 22, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
 

Pennsylvania's U.S. senators won't let a little thing like a disagreement over the filibuster break up their working relationship.

The Senate made history Thursday when it struck down filibuster rules for most presidential nominations, changing nearly 225 years of precedent to enable rapid confirmation of most nominees and selections for the federal judiciary without a 60-vote hurdle.

Democrat Bob Casey of Scranton and Republican Pat Toomey of Lehigh Valley told the Tribune-Review their opposite opinions would not bruise their ability to work together on executive and judicial nominees.

Casey said he and Toomey “have developed a successful bipartisan process to recommend highly qualified individuals to the White House,” and those candidates were confirmed “by strong majorities in the Senate.”

“Pennsylvanians expect and deserve to have two senators who work together to place highly capable jurists on the bench, who are fair and uphold high ethical standards,” he said.

Toomey said their working relationship will transcend the rule change. Since 2011, Toomey supported Obama's three judicial nominees; two are Western Pennsylvanians and filling the vacancies was overdue, he said at the time.

The rule change trims the votes needed to 51 for Senate approval of nominees against unanimous Republican opposition. The vote split mostly along party lines; 52 Democrats and independents supported weakening filibuster power.

West Virginia's Sen. Joe Manchin was one of three Democrats who opposed the change.

Manchin offered a compromise to the White House to avoid the change. He said the change “simply went too far” and that the filibuster is a vital protection of the minority's view — and exactly why the framers of the Constitution made the Senate the “cooling saucer.”

“We must always be mindful of our responsibility to preserve this institution's special purpose,” he said.

Salena Zito is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at szito@tribweb.com.

 

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. 12-year-old’s donated heart joins families, lets her memory live
  2. Steelers use 3 late first-half TDs to stun Texans
  3. Rossi: Steelers’ season all about going big
  4. Schools closed after state police ambush suspect reportedly sighted nearby
  5. Pitt executive vice chancellor to retire in December
  6. Rookie Bryant sparks deep passing game for Steelers in victory
  7. Jury selection for Ferrante trial begins today
  8. Demand for hazmat suits due to Ebola outbreak triples firm’s production
  9. Pa. Supreme Court Justice McCaffery suspended in email porn scandal
  10. Somerset County store clerk tells bandit to bug off with spray can
  11. Former Penn State assistant coach Johnson just visiting this time
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.