Donations to Ohio attorney general's charity have doubled since he took office
COLUMBUS — Lawyers, law firms and an Ohio lobbyist who have business in Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine's office all have contributed to a charity important to DeWine and his family, an Associated Press review found, and the donations have doubled since he assumed his new position.
The charity, Hands Together Inc., operates a school in Haiti named for DeWine's daughter, who died in a 1993 car crash. The tuition-free school provides meals and health care in an impoverished slum.
Funds raised at DeWine events for the school roughly doubled when he became Ohio's attorney general, from the less than $300,000 it had generated for years to more than $600,000, federal business filings show.
The donations show how companies or attorneys who seek to influence DeWine can find various ways to do so. Yet even the appearance of impropriety risks damaging the integrity of the office. DeWine, a Republican, serves as the state's top lawyer and law enforcer.
Donors who gave $5,000 or more in 2012 and 2013, as self-reported by the charity, included an Ohio lobbyist named Michael Kiggin who went to law school with DeWine, and representatives at two law firms he lobbies for that have landed lucrative outside counsel work with DeWine's office.
Ohio business people with histories of giving to DeWine's political campaigns as well as the charitable arms of three corporations involved in litigation with the state — Merck, Aetna and Medical Mutual of Ohio — contributed.
Spokespeople for Merck and Aetna said their giving was tied to programs that match charitable gifts by employees and retirees.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.