Dem retreats from controversial critique of Republican governor
MILWAUKEE — A day after sparking national headlines for using inflammatory language about Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's record on women's issues, Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz retreated from her harsh rhetoric in a statement issued on Thursday.
Wasserman Schultz evoked domestic violence in critiquing Walker's record.
“I shouldn't have used the words I used,” Wasserman Schultz said. “But that shouldn't detract from the broader point that I was making that Scott Walker's policies have been bad for Wisconsin women, whether it's mandating ultrasounds, repealing an equal pay law, or rejecting federal funding for preventative health care, Walker's record speaks for itself.”
During a women's roundtable event in Milwaukee on Wednesday, the Florida congresswoman said: “Scott Walker has given women the back of his hand. I know that is stark. I know that is direct. But that is reality.”
She added: “What Republican Tea Party extremists like Scott Walker are doing is they are grabbing us by the hair and pulling us back. It is not going to happen on our watch.”
Republican Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch said she was “shocked” that domestic violence language was used to discuss political disagreements.
“I think the remarks were absolutely hideous and the motive behind them was despicable,” she said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Vermont’s Sanders considers run for president
- Steelers not receiving big returns on their offseason investments
- Rossi: Given start, it’s time for Pitt to finish
- AHL overtime rules create some confusion for Penguins prospects
- NFL notebook: Jamaal Charles injures ankle vs. Broncos
- Rare triple play sparks Pirates’ comeback victory over Cubs
- Pitt notebook: Expanded game plan likely awaits Iowa
- Crash closes part of Route 30 in Unity
- Man accidentally shoots himself in North Point Breeze
- Long wait is over for Apollo-Ridge girls soccer team
- Mt. Washington landslide stable — for now