ShareThis Page

Attorney general's twin sister sued by FBI agent ex-boyfriend

Brian Bowling
| Thursday, July 2, 2015, 2:42 p.m.
In this file photo from March 2015, Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane walks from the State Supreme Court room at City Hall in Philadelphia.
In this file photo from March 2015, Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane walks from the State Supreme Court room at City Hall in Philadelphia.

Attorney General Kathleen Kane's twin borrowed $200,000 from an FBI agent who was living with her and then kicked him out the door, the agent says in a civil lawsuit filed in Lackawanna County.

Jacob J. Wentland III of Dunmore wants the court to order Ellen M. Granahan Goffer of Clarks Summit to repay the loan plus interest, according to the lawsuit filed June 18.

Wentland relied on Granahan's word and “has incurred a substantial loss due to his life savings being loaned to the defendant, as well as loss of interest and future investment opportunities,” the lawsuit says.

He pegs the total loss at about $269,000, plus the attorney's fees and other legal costs he's racking up in his attempt to collect the debt.

Wentland's lawyer, Samuel Stretton, couldn't be reached for comment.

Michael Perry, Granahan's lawyer, said he couldn't discuss the case because he hasn't talked with his client yet.

Kane's spokesman, Chuck Ardo, said the Attorney General's Office doesn't comment on employees' personal matters.

Granahan is a deputy attorney general who heads the child predator unit.

Wentland says in the lawsuit that he was assigned to the Houston FBI office when they began dating in December 2009 and that he obtained reassignments to Washington and then Scranton.

“He continued to date her and ultimately moved to Scranton, Pennsylvania, at her request, with the intention of marrying the defendant,” the lawsuit says.

Granahan was selling her South Abington house and another in Scranton to buy a house in Clarks Summit. When the deal hit a snag, Wentland loaned her $200,000 so she could buy the house while waiting to close on the sale of the other two homes, the lawsuit says.

The real estate deal hit further turbulence, and Granahan used the money to buy a different house in Clarks Summit, the lawsuit says.

Wentland moved into the home with Granahan and her children in January 2013 and remodeled the kitchen and basement, the lawsuit says.

That fall, he suspected she was having a relationship with a coworker and asked her to sign a loan agreement. She refused, and Wentland moved out in December 2013, the lawsuit says.

He moved back in a month later when they attempted reconciliation, but she demanded he move out in March 2014, the lawsuit says.

Granahan sold her Scranton house for $111,000 in July 2014, but didn't pay back any of the money she owed Wentland, the lawsuit says.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or bbowling@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.