ShareThis Page

Call for clean spending bill grows louder from Republican Pa. congressmen

| Monday, Oct. 7, 2013, 11:53 p.m.

When U.S. Rep. Charlie Dent broke ranks with the Republican majority in Pennsylvania's House delegation over defunding the Affordable Care Act, he said he did what representatives should do: vote the way constituents want.

“It is our job to represent the needs of our district,” said Dent, a five-term congressman from Allentown who represents parts of Dauphin and Lebanon counties and was the only Pennsylvania Republican who didn't vote with his party last week.

The state's 12 other House Republicans — including Reps. Keith Rothfus of Sewickley, Tim Murphy of Upper St. Clair and Mike Kelly of Butler — oppose the Democrats' effort to pass a spending bill free of provisions to scale back the law known as Obamacare.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, dug in on Monday, ruling out any measure to boost borrowing authority without concessions from President Obama.

“We could end this impasse today, but the president and the Democrat Senate leader aren't willing take up any bills passed out of the House, or sit down and work on a resolution,” Murphy said.

“Dozens of House Democrats have crossed the aisle and joined us in solutions to reopen important parts of the government,” Rothfus said.

Yet Dent last Tuesday and four other Eastern Pennsylvania representatives since then have split with the party to take positions in accordance with their districts, “in part because they believe that doing so is good for them politically,” said Kyle Kondik, a political analyst at the University of Virginia who specializes in House politics.

“Unfortunately for them, it often isn't,” Kondik said. “Look at what happened to the Democrats who voted no on Obamacare: Only six of the 34 remain in Congress.”

Dent blames GOP Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and his 21-hour speech for making folks believe he could get the Senate to defund Obamacare before the budget vote last week.

“He raised everyone's hopes, but he never had the votes, leaving everyone feeling let down,” Dent said.

In Washington, being reasonable is considered being weak, and being unreasonable or rigid is regarded as a sign of strength, said Michael Genovese, director of the Institute for Leadership Studies at Loyola Marymount University.

“It is all very backwards,” he said.

Given partisan changes in Pennsylvania over the past two decades — the East grew more Democratic and the West, more Republican — it is not surprising that Dent, a moderate representing Philadelphia collar counties, is interested in passing a clean stopgap spending bill instead of playing politics with Obama-care, said Lara Brown, a George Washington University political scientist.

Since the shutdown, Dent's call to reopen the government has been joined by Republican Reps. Jim Gerlach of Chester County, Mike Fitzpatrick of Bucks County, Pat Meehan of Montgomery County and Lou Barletta of Luzerne County, who indicated they would support a bill that doesn't include provisions to delay or defund Obamacare.

These suburban Republicans know that Obama carried their districts in 2008 and 2012, and their constituents “are generally supportive of the Affordable Care Act,” Brown said.

A CNN/ORC poll released on Monday found taxpayers individually blame both political parties and the White House for the government shutdown. Sixty-three percent of those questioned said they're angry at Republicans for the way they've handled the shutdown, and 57 percent aim their anger at Democrats. Fifty-three percent are unhappy with Obama's handling of the situation. The poll of 1,009 adults, conducted Oct. 3-6, has a sampling error of 3 percentage points.

Salena Zito is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach her at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.