ShareThis Page

Penn State football notebook: Purdue perfect tonic for Penn State

| Monday, Oct. 29, 2012
Penn State Nittany Lions running back Bill Belton (1) is stuffed by Ohio State Buckeyes linebacker Ryan Shazier during the 3rd quarter of their Leaders  Division game at Beaver Stadium in University Park on October 27, 2012. 
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
Penn State Nittany Lions running back Bill Belton (1) is stuffed by Ohio State Buckeyes linebacker Ryan Shazier during the 3rd quarter of their Leaders Division game at Beaver Stadium in University Park on October 27, 2012. Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review

Penn State's trip to Purdue this week probably couldn't come at a better time for an offensive line that struggled in a 35-23 loss to Ohio State.

Penn State managed just 38 yards rushing against the Buckeyes, while Matt McGloin was sacked four times and hit or hurried on numerous other occasions.

“They blitzed a significant amount,” Nittany Lions right guard John Urschel said. “They brought a decent amount of twists, slants, but as offensive linemen we need to be able to pick these things up. We'll look at the film on Monday and see where we made mistakes, where we can improve.”

Purdue looms as a get-well game, especially for the offensive line. The Boilermakers are free-falling, having lost four in a row, and they are 11th in the Big Ten in total defense (408.4 yards per game) and rushing defense (194.5).

Purdue played unbeaten Notre Dame tough and led Ohio State by eight points in the fourth quarter before falling in overtime.

The Boilermakers also have a potential first-round NFL draft pick in 6-foot-3, 315-pound defensive tackle Kawann Short.

For Penn State to get back to its winning ways, coach Bill O'Brien has to straighten out the offensive line.

“I have to think of something I can do better to help that offensive line with different schemes,” O'Brien said. “They're hurting, and they're going to really work hard to try and improve between now and Purdue.”

Missed opportunities

Penn State lost some hidden yardage in the third quarter against Ohio State when Adrian Amos intercepted a Braxton Miller pass and fell to the Beaver Stadium turf on the Buckeyes' 44-yard line.

The sophomore cornerback, who is also a kickoff returner, had plenty of running room in front of him, but he opted to play it safe and make sure he secured the first interception by a Penn State defensive back this season.

“Mostly, I was surprised where the ball was thrown,” Amos said.

Four plays later, with Penn State trailing, 14-10, O'Brien opted for a fake punt from the 43. Punter Alex Butterworth's pass to reserve running back Derek Day fell incomplete. That proved to be a turning point, not that O'Brien second-guessed the decision.

“I was just trying to make a play there,” O'Brien said. “I felt like at that point and time we wanted to try and get something going. We had it. We just didn't execute it as well as we could.”

Extra points

Tight end Kyle Carter led all receivers with six catches for 77 yards Saturday, but the redshirt freshman had only one reception for 5 yards in the first three quarters. ... Outside linebacker Mike Hull, a Canon-McMillan graduate, on his blocked punt that accounted for Penn State's first touchdown: “It kind of opened up like the Red Sea.”... True freshman receiver Trevor Williams made his first career start Saturday and caught one pass for 8 yards.

Scott Brown is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.