ShareThis Page

North Allegheny knows title goes through Central Catholic

Kevin Gorman
| Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012, 11:14 p.m.
Gateway's Delvon Randall is sandwiched between North Allegheny's Jack Henderson (2) and Ben Schweiger (24) and loses the ball  at Antimarino Stadium on Friday October 5, 2012.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Gateway's Delvon Randall is sandwiched between North Allegheny's Jack Henderson (2) and Ben Schweiger (24) and loses the ball at Antimarino Stadium on Friday October 5, 2012. Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review

When Art Walker arrived at North Allegheny in 2005, Central Catholic was never mentioned.

Never mind that Walker had led the Vikings to back-to-back WPIAL Class AAAA championships and an undefeated PIAA title in ‘04.

It wasn't until North Allegheny finally played Central — and beat the top-ranked Vikings, 17-7 — in the 2010 WPIAL semifinals that the Tigers truly re-established themselves as an elite Quad-A program.

“We didn't know if we were going to see anybody as tough as them,” Walker said. “That experience was crucial for us.”

Now, the roles are reversed.

Walker has North Allegheny (6-0, 5-0) ranked No. 1 in the WPIAL, and standing in the way of a young Central Catholic (5-1, 4-1) team that is trying to recapture the flag as the premier program in Quad-A.

This is only their second meeting in the past decade. That both are in the Quad North raises the stakes.

“I think all of that is true, but NA is extremely good,” said Central coach Terry Totten, who was Walker's defensive coordinator for four years before being promoted.

“They're well-coached, very good on both sides of the ball and special teams. They have a guy that can move the ball around. I don't see a weakness. We're not that kind of football team this year. We're not. I'm going to give it to you straight. We're going to battle, but we're a very young football team.”

Where Walker was reluctant to use Central as a template for North Allegheny — the former is a parochial school, the latter a public — their results are mirror images.

Since 2007, Central is 59-9, while North Allegheny is 61-10. Both have won PIAA titles (Central in '07, NA in '10), but the Tigers have an edge as two-time defending WPIAL champions with a 22-game win streak against district opponents.

“The system is in place,” Totten said of the Tigers. “They do a lot of similar things that we did. They're very sound, very well-coached. (Walker is) very thorough. He's bright. He knows football. He runs a tight ship. It's kind of the perfect storm out there right now. “

Where North Allegheny is coming off a 14-3 victory at then-No. 2 Gateway, Central is trying to regroup from a 34-7 loss at Seneca Valley Sept. 27. Considering North Allegheny beat Seneca Valley, 45-3, on Sept. 14, the Tigers are overwhelming favorites.

Walker has warned his players not to overlook Central, which has allowed six touchdowns all season, including one against Pine-Richland last week. The Vikings also should be bolstered by the return of three players who missed that Seneca Valley game: tailback Luigi Lista-Brinza, safety Garret Vrbanic and lineman Angelo Natter.

“When they played on Thursday night, I don't think by any means it showed what kind of quality team they are,” Walker said. “We're going to approach it like we're going to get their best game.

“We need to understand this game means so much more than last week's game. This one's bigger because it's a conference game. Our first goal is to try to win our conference, so this game is so important right now.”

More important than the opponent, which goes without saying.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 412-320-7812.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.