Power has shortage of points early in AFL season
Power coach Derek Stingley has a message for those critics questioning his team after its 0-3 start.
“What if we finish 15-3?” he said.
That would require a massive reversal of fortune.
The Power scored only 14 points Sunday in a loss to the Chicago Rush. The team was held without a point in the first half for the first time in its three-year history.
On the Arena Football League's 50-yard field, the Power have scored more than one touchdown in only three of 12 quarters this season.
Still, Stingley said his players are not discouraged.
“Our spirits are up,” he said. “We're not down. We're not tucking our tails. 0-3 doesn't mean anything.”
Their positive attitude will be tested Friday when the Power visits the New Orleans Voodoo at New Orleans Arena.
The Power is last in the AFL in points (82) and total offense (713 yards), but New Orleans (1-2) is next-to-last with 115 points and 760 yards.
Quarterback Jordan Jefferson, who played at LSU, returns to his native Louisiana after throwing five interceptions and completing only 53.2 percent of his passes in the first three games.
Stingley said Jefferson, who never had played indoor football before this season, is not feeling any pressure.
“Mentally, he's a tough young man,” Stingley said. “He was raised in a tough area. He told me this week, ‘Coach, I'm an athlete. I can do it all.' ”
Stingley said Jefferson remains the starter, but he also wants to see improvement against the Voodoo.
“He needs to make quicker decisions and better reads,” he said.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.