Steelers hope fans remember this draft for all the good selections
The Steelers began working on this NFL Draft on April 29, 2012, exactly one day after last year's draft ended.
The man-hours by the coaches and scouts spent watching games and traveling, viewing video after video of player after player, interviewing athletes and coaches, gathering 40-yard dash times, assembling data, assessing statistics and personality profiles and weighing empirical evidence are incalculable.
And it will mostly be one player — the one the Steelers choose Thursday night with the No. 17 pick — that is how all those hours and all that work is likely to be remembered.
Just like they remember 2004 for Ben Roethlisberger and mostly forget Ricardo Colclough. Just like they remember 2003 for Troy Polamalu but mostly forget Alonzo Jackson. Just like they remember 1991 for Huey Richardson and mostly forget ... well, that entire draft is eminently forgettable.
So what will it be for the Steelers in 2013: One to remember, or one to forget?
One that helps them win a Super Bowl like the 2004 draft or one that, like the 1983 draft, begins to send them on a sharp downward spiral that will require multiple drafts for atonement?
And, mostly, who will be the one?
Unanticipated trades and unexpected personnel decisions can skew any draft, just as it did a year ago when guard David DeCastro fell to the Steelers at No. 24, well below where he was projected to go. And they could again in this draft, one in which no two mock drafts seem to look remotely alike.
The draft pool is considered to be good at some positions — wide receiver, cornerback and safety. But less so at others — quarterback, running back and defensive end.
For the Steelers, predraft speculation has centered on five players: outside linebacker Jarvis Jones of Georgia, running back Eddie Lacy of Alabama, wide receiver Cordarrelle Patterson of Tennessee, tight end Tyler Eifert of Notre Dame and safety Kenny Vaccaro of Texas. Wide receiver Keenan Allen of Cal also has been mentioned.
The Steelers have a need at those positions, though perhaps less so at safety. Jones is a high-motor, high-production pass rusher who would seem to be the logical successor to James Harrison. He also plays a position where the Steelers are down two players.
Lacy would be a feature back-type for a team that badly lacks one.
Patterson is seen as the receiver perhaps best equipped to replace the ever-so-fast Mike Wallace, though there are questions about some of his on-field decision-making and off-field preparation.
Vaccaro is seen as the best of a talented group of safeties and certainly might be enticing to a team that has two safeties who will be in their 30s next season in Ryan Clark (34) and Polamalu (32).
“There will be a good player at No. 17, there's no question about that,” Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert said.
The best player — and the best fit — appears to be Jones, though the Jets at No. 13 and the Saints at No. 15 could snatch him away first. There were some questions about a spinal condition that caused him to leave Southern Cal for Georgia but not enough that he was brought back for a second round of NFL testing.
Jones thinks the Steelers would be a good fit, and he certainly does not expect to go any lower than 17th.
“If the Steelers took me, it would be a great place to play,” Jones told PFT Talk, an online show that also featured Colbert the same day. “I love playing in the 3-4 system. I definitely understand a lot of the concepts and the things that they do there, being that I played in a 3-4 system. I think the Steelers are a great place to play, especially on defense.”
The Steelers appear to think Jones would be a great fit to play for them, too; he visited them several weeks ago for an in-house interview, no doubt in part to discuss the spinal issue.
If Jones is around at No. 17 slightly past 10 p.m., the wait will be over for him. And the Steelers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Mother, baby found dead in Millvale apartment
- Polamalu could be next in long line of Steelers greats given unceremonial exit
- Search for bomb turns up nothing at Kittanning school
- Rossi: Kang would benefit from less attention
- Wolf reverses Corbett, says deal between Highmark, UPMC doesn’t limit continuity of care to very ill
- Pirates pitcher Locke fighting for 5th spot in starting rotation
- Heidelberg bar shut down for not paying drink tax
- Weather continues to cause crashes, public transportation delays
- Over the falls — Cucumber Falls that is — go 3 kayakers in Ohiopyle
- Pitt names new chairman of Department of Medicine
- Penguins’ Lovejoy embracing defensive pairing with Pouliot