Pitt lands prized basketball transfer
By Jerry DiPaola
Published: Sunday, April 8, 2012,
Trey Zeigler used to follow Pitt men's basketball players on their NCAA Tournament runs, spending time with stars Brandin Knight, Julius Page and Jaron Brown.
No later than the 2013-14 season, he may be able to help the Panthers.
Zeigler is a 6-foot-5 shooting guard who averaged 16 points at Central Michigan the past two seasons.
He said Saturday night he has decided to transfer to Pitt, where his father, Ernie, served with coach Jamie Dixon on Ben Howland's staff from 2001-03.
Zeigler likely will sit out the 2012-13 season, according to NCAA transfer rules, but Ernie Zeigler said he is hoping "extenuating circumstances" will make his son immediately eligible.
Ernie Zeigler was fired as Central Michigan's coach this year after six seasons.
"He is revisiting home," Ernie Zeigler said.
"Jamie is on the cusp of doing more special things. Trey wants to be a part of it."
The younger Zeigler said he chose Pitt over offers from Duke, UCLA, Arizona State and LSU.
Zeigler's ties to Pitt through his father attracted him to the Panthers, but he also said he is intrigued by the team's 2012 recruiting class that includes forwards Steven Adams and Chris Jones and point guard James Robinson.
"It had a little bit to do with my roots," he said, "but they also have a great recruiting class coming in."
At Central Michigan, Zeigler averaged 15.8 points, 6.7 rebounds and 31.8 minutes this season.
He will enroll at Pitt in time for the first summer session and be on campus in May.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.