Pitt misses out on NIT, will host Wofford in CBI
By John Grupp
Published: Monday, March 12, 2012
Pitt's worst season in more than a decade isn't quite over.
The Panthers (17-16), denied by the 32-team National Invitational Tournament, will host Wofford (19-13) in the pay-to-play College Basketball Invitational.
Pitt, which survived a scare to beat Wofford, 63-60, in the 2009-10 season opener, missed the 68-team NCAA Tournament for the first time since 2001. The Panthers were left out of the NIT later last night before accepting an 11th-hour spot in the CBI, a 16-team tournament that in the past cost upwards of $60,000 to host a game.
The winner will play the Princeton-at-Evansville winner in the second round on March 19 at an undetermined site and time.
The only other BCS schools in the CBI are Oregon State and Washington State.
Meanwhile, Robert Morris (24-10) will visit Indiana State (18-14) at 7:05 p.m. Tuesday in the opening round of the 24-team Collegeinsider.com Tournament, which is aimed toward mid-majors and doesn't take schools from BCS conferences.
"They deserve to be playing," RMU coach Andrew Toole said. "We practiced today, and there was great excitement about being able to continue to play."
This would have marked the first time since 1978-79 that the Panthers finished a season with a winning record and weren't invited to a postseason tournament.
The players said after a disappointing 64-52 loss to Georgetown in the second round of the Big East Tournament on Wednesday at Madison Square Garden that they would welcome an NIT bid.
At the time, athletic director Steve Pederson said he and coach Jamie Dixon would "talk about" the CBI if the NIT didn't invite the Panthers.
The CBI begins Tuesday with first-round games. All games are played at host sites — they are reseeded after the quarterfinals — with a best-of-three finals March 26, 28 and 30.
Only two Big East teams — St. John's in 2009 and Cincinnati in '08 — have ever played in the CBI, a fifth-year event.
Dixon could not be reached for comment.
Pitt (98 RPI) applied for a berth in the NIT but missed the cut in a season in which it went 5-13 in the Big East and lost 15 of its final 21 games. Some at-large NIT picks selected ahead of the Panthers included Iowa (17-16, 8-10 in Big Ten, 139 RPI) and Minnesota (19-14, 6-12 in Big Ten, 89 RPI).
Robert Morris lost to Long Island, 90-73, in the NEC finals, while Indiana State, which is hosting its first postseason game in 34 years, fell to Wichita State, 72-48, in the Missouri Valley Conference quarterfinals.
"We didn't play our best game in the championship game, and I know, personally, I don't want that to be the last feeling about this team and this season," Toole said.
Toole said his players will leave Monday for a seven-hour bus ride to Terre Haute, Ind.
"It's a long bus ride," Toole said. "But we are fortunate to be able to be getting on the bus."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.