Gun sales continue to spike into 2012 with high number of background checks
By Bob Frye
Published: Monday, Jan. 30, 2012,
Gun manufacturers are expecting another good year in 2012.
According to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, one of the best indicators of firearms sales is the FBI's national instant background check system, which gun sellers use to conduct mandatory background checks on people buying new and used firearms. December "marked an unprecedented 19th straight month of background check increases when compared to the same period in the previous year," the group said.
NSSF-adjusted background checks for December totaled more than 1.4 million, the most ever for any month.
Last year also saw the record for the single-most sales on a particular day. "Black Friday," Nov. 25, had 129,166 background checks. That was a 32 percent increase over the previous one-day record.
Another indicator pointing to robust gun sales is the federal excise taxes collected on the sale of new firearms and ammunition, which have risen 48.3 percent over the past five years, the foundation reported.
That trend should continue, the group added. Industry professionals at the SHOT Show — the hunting and shooting industry's annual trade show, which just wrapped up in Las Vegas — said this year could feature another similar surge in firearm sales.
It will be another six weeks or so before the Pennsylvania Game Commission releases its estimates on how many deer hunters shot this past hunting season.
But Ohio hunters know how they did, and it was not necessarily good.
Hunters there — beset by the same kind of warm, rainy weather that plagued a couple of days of Pennsylvania's statewide deer season — shot 14 percent fewer deer in 2011 than they did in 2010.
The kill was down 39 percent after opening day. Hunters made much of that up but never got back to even, according to the Ohio Division of Wildlife.
The total harvest was 90,282 animals. In 2010, sportsmen killed 105,034 deer.
Speaking of Ohio, consider this: Periodically, there's talk of merging at least the Pennsylvania Game and Fish and Boat commissions, and sometimes even the Department of Conservation and Natural resources, too.
In Ohio, several top-ranking officials with the department of wildlife were fired this fall, replaced in the top spot by a former leader of the state's department of agriculture. According to media reports coming from that state, the move has fueled speculation that there are plans to merge the departments of Natural Resources and Agriculture, along with the Ohio Environmental Protective Agency.
A free webinar miniseries recently completed by the Quality Deer Management Association for Penn State University and American Tree Farm Systems is available online.
The webinars, or web-based seminars, cover implementing a successful deer management program on your property, while-tailed deer breeding biology and communication, providing quality habitat for deer, and one on timber management for deer.
You can see them at www.treefarmsystem.com .
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.