Commissioners ponder changes to bear, pheasant seasons
By Bob Frye
Published: Sunday, Jan. 22, 2012
Allegheny County gave up its first black bear to a hunter in at least 62 years this past fall. That's prompting changes.
Washington County did not give up any wild pheasants to hunters this past fall, or at least very few. That's prompting changes, too.
Pennsylvania Game Commissioners are meeting in Harrisburg today through Tuesday. Before they're done, they'll give preliminary approval to seasons and bag limits for the 2012-13 hunting and trapping seasons. Final approval will come in April.
At this meeting, when it comes to bears, commissioners have two proposals on their agenda.
It's been recommended that hunters be allowed to take black bears during all deer seasons, from September through mid-December, in wildlife management units 1A, 2B, 5B, 5C and 5D. Unit 2B takes in most of Allegheny County, along with parts of Beaver, Butler, Washington and Westmoreland. Unit 1A includes all of Mercer and Lawrence counties and parts of Beaver, Butler, Crawford and Venango.
Units 5B, 5C and 5D are all in southeastern Pennsylvania.
"Pennsylvania's black bear population is larger and more widely distributed than ever and bear-human incidents are becoming commonplace, especially in more developed areas," reads the agency agenda. "In these five WMUs, with relatively high-human-population densities, there currently are low bear densities, the commission wants to continue to have a minimum number of bears, and the commission wants hunters to have an opportunity to play an important role in bear-population management in these areas."
Commissioners will also be asked to consider a muzzleloader season for bears in those same five units. It would run from Oct. 13-20.
The proposed change on the pheasant front is a sadder tale.
Wild, naturally-reproducing populations of ringnecks had disappeared from most of the state by the early part of this century. In an attempt to reverse that, pheasant hunters met and -- over objections of some within the commission -- got the OK to import wild birds from the Midwest and release them into the Pike Run watershed in Washington County.
That succeeded in spawning a wild pheasant restoration program that has since spread across the state.
Where it's failed is in producing wild pheasants in Washington County. Despite a decade of habitat work and no hunting, "pheasant densities are at one hen per square mile, far short of the 10 hens per square mile objective," the agenda reads.
As a result, commissioners will be asked to open the area to either-sex pheasant hunting and reinstate the stocking of game farm pheasants beginning this fall.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.