Greensburg Trib Spotlight Female Athlete of the Week
By Andrew John
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 25, 2012
School: Greensburg Salem
Claim to fame: Oberdorf made a career-high seven 3-pointers and scored 28 points to lead Greensburg Salem (6-8, 3-4) in a 55-46 win over Laurel Highlands in Section 3-AAA action Jan. 19. Oberdorf scored 22 points in a 51-47 loss to Franklin Regional on Jan. 21, and also added 19 points in a 54-46 loss to Mt. Pleasant on Jan. 16. Oberdorf also pitches for the Greensburg Salem softball team.
"I'm just happy right now because I have been working on my shot a lot in practice, and now it's coming along," Oberdorf said.
What's your favorite sport, basketball or softball?
I'd say whatever is in season. It just depends.
You have a younger sister, Claire. Is there any sisterly competition•
We just push each other a lot. Sometimes it's frustrating, but after practice we are still friends.
Who's the better athlete?
We're different. She's more of a finesse player. She is more natural, and I just power my way through everything.
What's your favorite part about sports?
Definitely love having something to do and always being active. If I had to go home and do homework, I wouldn't like it. I just like hanging out with my teammates the best. We are like a family.
What's your most memorable moment?
Beating Laurel Highlands (last) Thursday because it was a much needed win for us.
What do you like the most, hitting a game-winning 3-pointer or having an outstanding pitching performance?
Since it's basketball season, I would have to say hitting the game-winning 3. If it was softball season, it would be the other way around.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.