Malkin calls loss 'most' disappointing
The Flyers' Braydon Coburn knocks the Penguins' Evgeni Malkin on his backside in the first period during Game 6 of the Eastern Conference quarterfinals at the Wells Fargo Center on April 22, 2012.
Photo by Chaz Palla | Tribune Review
PHILADELPHIA — Evgeni Malkin can't believe his Penguins are done.
He described a first-round loss to the Philadelphia Flyers as “the most” disappointing defeat in his NHL career. That includes a loss in the '08 Cup Final.
Malkin finished with three goals and eight points, but only two goals and half of his points were produced at even strength.
He tallied a career-best 50 goals and 109 points during the regular season — the latter good for his second NHL scoring title. However, this playoff loss will linger, Malkin said Sunday.
He spoke exclusively with Trib Total Media afterward.
TTM: What happened with your production during this series?
EM:It was a tough series. I tried hard. To play against the checking line all the way was hard.
TTM: Did you allow yourself to get too frustrated by the matchup with center Sean Couturier?
EM:No. I tried to play my game. I don't know. It's hard to say now. They did a great job. The Flyers are a great team.
TTM: How long will the aftertaste of this loss last?
EM: Of course I'm thinking about it now. But after a couple of days I will watch (the) tape, look at my games and try to work in the summer to get better again.
TTM:Your team was the favorite, so is losing in the first round acceptable?
EM:Every team has a chance to win, not just Pittsburgh. You see the Rangers are down, too. It's tough to win it every year. And we played against (the Flyers), and they played unbelievable against us all year. ... Defensively, offensively, they did it all against us. I thought maybe with their goalie maybe it would be good for us, but it wasn't.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.