ShareThis Page

Pennsylvania Game Commission debates deer season rules

| Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Bradford is in the running for the title of "America's Toughest Weather City."

That's no surprise to Ken Kane.

A forester with Keith Horn Inc., he's seen deer seasons marked by five feet of snow and witnessed how landowners, who say they need hunters to take deer, have tried to deal with that. One spends $15,000 annually to keep roads into his property open for hunters, he said.

Still, hunters need as much time as they can get in the woods if they are to keep deer at levels that allow forests to grow, Kane said. That's why he asked Pennsylvania Game Commission members at their April meeting not only to offer a suitable number of doe licenses but, most importantly, to maintain two weeks of concurrent buck and doe hunting in all wildlife management units.

"You have to take into account the weather of the northern tier of this commonwealth," Kane said. "It's a different climate."

Last season was proof of that, he said. Deer season in the region was marked by loads of snow. That hurt the hunting, especially as the season wore on.

"You know me. I drive a half-ton pickup with chains on the tires, and I was out looking," Kane said. "Not only couldn't I find a hunter, I couldn't find a vehicle."

He didn't convince the board. It put additional wildlife management units under split-season rules, with five days of bucks-only hunting followed by seven days of concurrent hunting.

Commissioner Ralph Martone of New Castle spoke for the majority of the board when he said he was supporting split seasons to provide more hunters with opportunities.

Unit 2F, for example, sells out of doe tags within a matter of days, he said. That leaves a lot of hunters without a license.

"We can split the season, up the number of tags by 20 percent as you're requesting and offer more recreation for hunters," Martone said.

The state has made strides in promoting forest — and deer — health, said Ron Fallon, a ranger in Allegheny National Forest's Marienville District. He said there's been "substantial progress" made on forest lands over the past few years. That includes not only habitat, but also deer, according to studies of hunter-harvested deer in the Kinzua Quality Deer Cooperative.

"We've seen the number of antler points, beam diameter and antler spread all go up at the same time that body weights have increased across all ages and sex classes," Fallon said.

Kane hopes that continues, even as Bradford squares off against Fargo, N.D., in the Weather Channel's "Cold-Weather Championship Showdown."

"If we get that weather, we can't do it; we can't manage deer without access," Kane said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.