Steelers support goes wild
By Luis Fábregas
Published: Saturday, Jan. 24, 2009
Let's hope that big brown bear is right.
Goaded by an animal keeper at the Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium, Rocky the Kodiak bear on Saturday picked the Steelers as winners of next week's Super Bowl.
The zoo conducted a pep rally yesterday as anticipation builds for Sunday's Super Bowl matchup between the Steelers and the Arizona Cardinals. Perhaps because of the 20-degree temperatures, the crowd yesterday was unusually thin.
Rocky's antics began when the keeper placed two boxes in the bear's area, one marked with the Steelers logo, the other with a bright red cardinal. Rocky, who turns 27 today, made his way to the Steelers box in a matter of seconds.
"I think we have a winner," Mo Brown, the animal keeper, told a few dozen people who watched the bear in amusement. Brown laughed when asked what he put in the box to lure his pal and would not say.
The bear and several of his friends -- two lions, three orangutans, and five gorillas -- hammed it up for zoo visitors. The lions tore up cardinals cutouts in their pen. The orangutans rubbed their bodies with Terrible Towels. One of them put on a Steelers T-Shirt.
"That's hilarious," said Nicole Skarbek of Butler who was holding her 20-month-old son, Gavin. "We're excited. We didn't know there was going to be a pep rally."
About two dozen people watched the animals do their tricks and egged on a group of gorillas as they wrestled a snowman sporting a Cardinals jersey. Bill Hawk of New Kensington, was decked out in a Steelers jogging suit, his Terrible Towel tucked in his pocket.
He missed Friday's big rally at Heinz Field and took photographs of the animals for his grandchildren and great-grandkids.
"I've been a Steelers fan all my life," said Hawk, 71. "I feel good about this game. I think they're going to win."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.