Beaver Run Reservoir fishing status still undecided
By Bob Frye
Published: Sunday, Aug. 5, 2007
If Beaver Run Reservoir were opened to public fishing, it would likely see bigger-than-average crowds of anglers at first, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission officials admit.
But they don't think that will last.
The commission is seeking to come to some kind of agreement with the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County -- which owns the lake -- to open a portion of it to fishing. The authority has never allowed fishing at the lake. Earlier this spring, authority officials told the commission that they would need some questions answered before they could decide whether to change that stance.
One question centered around how many people might visit the lake if it were opened to fishing.
The commission's answer, outlined in a letter from executive director Doug Austen to the authority, is an average of 5,622 anglerstrips per month from April through August.
The commission has no "magic formula" for determining how many angler trips a lake will generate based on its size or fishery, said spokesman Dan Tredinnick. However, there is generally a lot of interest in fishing a water supply reservoir when it first opens, he said.
That interest tends to tail off over time, Tredinnick said, but -- given the fact that anglers routinely sneak in to fish Beaver Run now, despite the threat of being fined for trespassing -- there would undoubtedly be a lot of interest in the lake initially.
"Our estimate is kind of on the higher side of average," he said.
How that might impact the authority's thinking is unclear. Officials with the agency have been loathe to discuss their plans for the lake publicly, and some board members have privately expressed unhappiness with the amount of media and angler "pressure" they've received on the issue.
Authority manager Chris Kerr declined to comment on the commission's responses to authority questions, too. He expects the authority to set up a meeting with the Fish and Boat Commission, but he said officials haven't yet had time to review the letter in depth.
"We just received their letter the other day," Kerr said. "We're in the process of looking it over and seeing if it answers our questions and meets our needs, but I can't really comment beyond that right now."
More on Beaver RunHere's a look at what else the Fish and Boat Commission had to say regarding Beaver Run Reservoir:
* The commission indicated a willingness -- through grants, in-kind services or materials, and signage -- to build parking lots that would have 'little or no impact on the environment and the Authority's forestry and gas well programs.' The commission would also pay for some or all of the costs of installing portable toilets.
* The commission would provide 'vigorous and sufficient' law enforcement patrols, especially the first year.
* Opening Beaver Run to shoreline fishing would not, the commission said, decrease the revenues the county currently receives from boating, hiking, pavilion rentals and other resources at its parks because there are no plans to add those amenities at the reservoir.
* If the reservoir were opened to fishing, commission biologists would sample the lake and determine the appropriate regulations for it.
* According to the commission, the state Department of Environmental Protection does not recommend barring access to drinking water reservoirs for reasons of homeland security. Instead, the 'DEP believes outdoors enthusiasts can be a good set of eyes and ears for the water supplier.' With that in mind, the commission would post signs with phone numbers anglers could call if they noticed any suspicious activity.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.