Passion complete perfect season
By JoAnne Klimovich Harrop
Published: Sunday, June 17, 2007,
The Passion completed a perfect regular season Saturday by crushing yet another opponent, but they won't have long to celebrate.
Playoffs begin Saturday.
The Passion defeated the Central PA Vipers by a season-high score of 77-0, before an announced crowd of 3,500 fans at Cupples Stadium to finish at 8-0 and claim the Central Division title of the National Women's Football Association.
It was the Passion's third shutout this season.
"We won't have much time to bask in this win," said Passion quarterback Lisa Horton, who surpassed the 1,000-yard mark for the season. "We have to get back to work on Tuesday for practice. Everything clicked for us (last night). This has been an unbelievable season."
It isn't over yet.
The Passion host Erie at 7 p.m. in the first round of the playoffs Saturday.
Last night, the Passion dominated winless Central PA, a team out of Harrisburg in its second season in the NWFA. Central PA had minus 29 yards rushing and 16 yards passing.
The Passion offense was led by Horton and running back Torina Henley, who also reached the 1,000-yard mark. Horton completed 3 of 7 passes for 93 yards and a touchdown. Henley rushed for 176 yards on 11 carries and scored five touchdowns.
"This was a total team effort," Henley said. "I owe a lot of those yards to the line and fullback Lyndsi Hughes. The women on this team push each other to be the best we can be. We can't wait for the playoffs."
The Passion came out strong. They ran 18 plays, scored eight touchdowns and forced four turnovers -- just in the first half -- and led, 56-0. The Passion opened the second half with a 60-yard run by Wilma Walton for a 63-0 advantage and added two touchdowns to complete the scoring.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.