Starkey: Ben: Fans love the run
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Ben Roethlisberger is throwing some nice passes at Steelers OTAs. He's also throwing some darts, though it can be difficult to decipher their targets. And their significance.
Take our cryptic exchange, for example.
It didn't last long, perhaps because Ben had to resume the arduous process of getting a new playbook shoved down his throat. But it might have contained a large clue about coordinator Todd Haley's “Rosetta Stone” offense.
I began by acknowledging the obvious: Roethlisberger understandably was not pleased with the coordinator change. So is it now just a matter of getting on board?
“Yeah, absolutely,” Ben said. “You have no choice.”
Then came a dart.
“And like I said, every day's getting a little bit better, and we're learning -- and we'll be running the ball a lot this year, so fans should be happy.”
Me: “Will you guys be running a lot?”
Him: “I think so.”
Me: “Is that the plan?”
Him: “That's the way it seems ... I know the fans want it, so it looks like they'll be getting their wish.”
Hmmm. Do fans really want that?
My impression is that there has always been a small but vocal minority who harbor a quaint notion of smash-mouth Steelers football. They dream of the next Franco Harris or Jerome Bettis — Franco Bettis? — barreling behind a 250-pound fullback and “Iron” Maurkice Pouncey 47 times a game.
Those folks seem to forget that the Steelers largely passed their way to Super Bowl wins as far back as 1978 and '79. They also overlook the ensuing quarter-century championship drought and the fact that it ended only when the Steelers finally found a replacement for Terry Bradshaw.
The team's past four Super Bowl MVPs have been a quarterback (Bradshaw twice) and two receivers (Santonio Holmes, Hines Ward), you know, not running backs or pulling guards.
I have to believe most fans just want more touchdowns. The major failing of the Arians era was mediocre red-zone play, and as a consequence, not enough end-zone play.
Time of possession was not a problem. The Steelers were top five the past four years.
Sure, they should improve the running game, which was middle-of-the pack in carries and efficiency last season. But does anybody really care how they score, so long as they score more?
This isn't the first time Roethlisberger has made reference to certain “influences” wanting the Steelers to run more. He mentioned it a few years ago, wondering if those influences forced him and Bruce Arians to pass less than they would have liked.
Ben is an interesting study.
Anyway, the obvious follow-up question: Given that the Steelers have a star quarterback and mad talent at receiver, one has to believe they'll wing it around at some point, no?
“Who knows?” Ben said. “We'll see.”
Yes. Yes we will.
Look, whether you agree with their moves or not, it isn't hard to figure out the Steelers' rationale in changing systems and drafting a bunch of linemen. Haley, coach Mike Tomlin, GM Kevin Colbert and team owner Art Rooney II are smart men. They want to keep their franchise quarterback in one piece as he enters decade No. 4 on the planet.
Quicker passes combined with a better running game theoretically would propel Roethlisberger toward a simpler, safer game. But be sure of this: He still will improvise.
Remember, this is a man who said he wants to hear Frank Sinatra's “My Way” accompany his Hall of Fame induction.
So I knew the answer before I asked: Will he alter his style in an effort to stay healthy?
“No,” Ben said. “I'm just going to play the way I know how.”
And what if that still includes drawing 'em up in the sand? Will he get rebuked on the sidelines after one of those?
“You might see more of it, because I don't know what everyone's doing on every play,” Roethlisberger said. “It might be like my rookie year, where I find one guy, and if he's not open, I start scrambling.
“So who knows? We'll see.”
Yes. Yes we will.
Joe Starkey co-hosts a show 2-6 p.m. weekdays on 93.7 “The Fan.” His columns appear Thursdays and Sundays. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.