Valasek lifts Ford City hockey team
By Leader Times
Published: Thursday, Feb. 17, 2011,
Ford City's hockey team flexed its first-place muscle with a home win over Hollidaysburg on Wednesday night at the Belmont Complex in West Kittanning.
The Sabers (16-1-1) defeated Hollidaysburg (13-6), the second-place team in the Open Class Chiefs Division, 7-4, with the help of a hat trick by junior Kevin Valasek and steady performances in net from sophomore Adam Cogley (14 saves) and senior Tyler Skerkavich (13 saves).
Ford City needed a third-period surge to clinch the game. It went ahead, 3-0, in the first period but allowed three goals in the second period and watched Hollidaysburg tie the score, 4-4, early in the third.
"I was nervous," coach Doug Anthony said. "We played a sloppy game. There was a total of about one good period tonight. But they kept their composure."
The Sabers were called for 10 penalties — four came in the second period — while Hollidaysburg earned only four trips to the box.
Valasek finished with three goals and one assist, while his younger brother, Jesse, a sophomore, had a goal and two assists. Senior David Lowry also had a three-point night (one goal, two assists), freshman John Phelps had two assists, and senior Alex Gladysiewski logged a goal and an assist.
Ford City is guaranteed the top spot in the Chiefs Division half of the Open Class tournament, which begins Feb. 27.
"It feels good to have that (top seed) secured and out of the way," Anthony said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.