IUP dismisses football coach Tepper after 6-5 season
By Dave Mackall
Published: Saturday, Dec. 18, 2010
After changing its bad-boy image in football by hiring conservative coach Lou Tepper five years ago, Indiana (Pa.) on Friday again found itself contemplating the future after announcing Tepper won't return next season.
IUP athletic director Frank Condino said in a statement that the school would begin an immediate search for Tepper's successor.
Condino was traveling and unavailable yesterday.
Tepper did not return a message left with the IUP football office.
Tepper will depart Dec. 31, although his contract doesn't expire until June 30. An IUP athletic department spokesman said Tepper will be "appropriately compensated" for the rest of his contract.
Tepper, 65, a native of Derry, Westmoreland County, has a career record of 101-75-2 with stints at IUP, Edinboro and Illinois. But he didn't win enough games at IUP to be retained, Condino said. IUP interim president David Werner agreed, saying a change in leadership was "the best option."
Tepper's five-year record at IUP was 36-18 but was 11-11 over the past two seasons.
IUP became an NCAA Division II power under former West Virginia coach Frank Cignetti, who led the Crimson Hawks to 19 consecutive top 25 seasons from 1986-2004.
Tepper's 2007 team was his only at IUP to earn a Super Region 1 playoff berth.
"Our football program needs to move in a new direction," Condino said. "After a thorough review of the program's history and this season, I don't have confidence that the current leadership can change course and position the team for a stronger future."
Condino said Tepper and his staff "undoubtedly made an enormous impact on the lives of the young men they have coached and mentored, (and) we are indebted for the contributions made to the players, the athletics department, IUP and the greater Indiana area."
Tepper led IUP to top 25 finishes during his first three seasons from 2006-08, but the Crimson Hawks fell out of the final rankings the past two seasons.
"We were expecting the team to be more competitive in both the PSAC and the NCAA Super Region 1," Condino said. "A record of 11-11 over the last two years is not what our supporters expect, and it's not what they deserve."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.