South Fayette receiver considering Pitt
South Fayette wide receiver Zach Challingsworth hates the word “decommit,” but he said he couldn't avoid it when Pitt offered him a scholarship.
“It's the business,” said Challingsworth, who committed to Toledo on Monday before changing his mind Wednesday and is now considering Pitt. “I don't feel good about it, but it's where my heart's at.”
Challingsworth attended Pitt's prospects camp last weekend, but he didn't receive a scholarship offer. That's when he verbally committed to Toledo, whose coaches sent him 58 letters in one day this spring. He also had offers from Akron, Buffalo, Eastern Michigan, Kent State, Ohio and Temple.
“I wasn't sure what Pitt was doing,” he said.
Finally, Pitt invited him to campus for a visit Wednesday. At the end of it, Pitt made him an offer, and he decommitted from Toledo.
“It's been a confusing week,” he said.
Challingsworth, 6-foot-2 and 190 pounds, was one of the most productive receivers in the WPIAL last season, posting 48 receptions for 800 yards and 12 touchdowns. He also intercepted six passes at defensive back and blocked four field-goal attempts.
Top Penn State recruit suffers knee injury
Tight end Adam Breneman, a Penn State commit considered the nation's top tight end in the Class of 2013, suffered a knee injury yesterday during a seven-on-seven camp at Cedar Cliff High School.
He told The (Harrisburg) Patriot-News that he is praying it's not an ACL injury but was told it might be. As a junior last year, he caught 72 passes for 1,120 yards and 12 touchdowns.
Nittany Lions add New Jersey linebacker
Penn State added its third recruit for the Class of 2013 on Wednesday when linebacker Brandon Bell gave a verbal commitment.
Bell, rated a three-star recruit by Rivals.com, is a 6-2, 215-pounder from Oakcrest High School in Mays Landing, N.J. He also had offers from Rutgers and West Virginia, among others.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.