Gateway quarterback picks Arizona
College Football Videos
Thomas Woodson relished the opportunity to run the same offense in college that he does at Gateway, so the dual-threat quarterback did what he does best: read the situation and decided where to run.
In this case, it's all the way to Arizona.
Woodson made a verbal commitment to Arizona Sunday night, choosing the Wildcats over a scholarship offer from Bowling Green. Ohio, Purdue and Toledo were showing interest in the 6-foot-1, 215-pounder.
“They were the first team to give me a chance,” Woodson said of Rich Rodriguez and his staff, primarily recruiter Tony Gibson. “I thought, Why not pull the trigger on a coaching staff that has followed me since I started playing varsity ball? It was just the feeling I have about Arizona and the coaching staff.”
Woodson passed for 1,177 yards and 11 touchdowns and rushed for 160 yards and two scores on 43 carries last season. His top performance came against Latrobe, when he passed for 334 yards. As a sophomore, Woodson passed for 1,362 yards and ran for 468 yards out of a read-option offense.
“Their offense is the same I run in high school. It'll be great,” Woodson said. “Our offense is run exactly like theirs, with the quarterback reading the defensive end. It'll be great to do at the college level what I've been doing for three years now.”
Woodson becomes the third WPIAL star to pick Arizona, which has a staff with a heavy Western Pennsylvania influence. Chartiers Valley wide receiver Wayne Capers and Upper St. Clair linebacker Dakota Conwell signed with Arizona in February.
“It's nice knowing those guys,” said Woodson, who played with them on the Western PA Swag seven-on-seven team last summer. “They're great people and great athletes, so it will be nice to have them there when I get there.”
Kevin Gorman can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.