Moon bowler named to All-American team
By Andrew John
Published: Wednesday, June 27, 2012, 9:08 p.m.
Last week, Sarah Ross received surprising news that included her in some elite company from around the country.
The recent Moon High School graduate was named to the Dexter/United States Bowling Congress High School All-American team, which consists of five girls and five boys high school bowlers.
“It was a big surprise,” said Ross, who averaged 204 this winter for the Tigers, with a 679 high series. “I was nominated by my athletic director (Ricci Rich) and then it was a wait-and-see. But when I got the call, it made for a pretty happy night.”
The Dexter/USBC High School All-American team normally consists of bowlers from Western New York and bowlers from out west. The last Pittsburgh native to be an All-American bowler was Seneca Valley's Tim Pfeifer in 2005.
Ross was a four-year captain for Moon's bowling team, selected to the WPIBL all-section first team in the previous two seasons, and a state qualifier. Ross was a four-year player on the Tigers softball team.
Ross, whose personal best is 279, was a decorated high school student, as well, as a member of the National Honor Society. Ross has given back to the community by coaching bowling and softball youth athletes and has worked at Make-A-Wish bowling benefits.
Ross will move on to compete for the St. Francis University bowling team next season and hopes to help the squad challenge for a national title.
“Tom Falbo was one of the first to recruit me,” said Ross on why she selected the Red Flash. “I know some of the girls on the team and our potential.”
Ross will major in business management, in hopes of following her father's footsteps. He is a partner in the Crafton-Ingram Lanes.
“I hope to own or to manage my own bowling alley,” she said.
Andrew John is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.